Kiki Daniels - Babestation Nights - Chat & Discussion (Only)

(19-08-2018 14:20 )winsaw Wrote:  snip

Shouldn't be too difficult for Kiki to send some screenshots if that was true?

Or maybe she's too busy

(19-08-2018 14:57 )T Bone Wrote:  He joined this forum nearly 10 years ago, i doubt he was 6 or 7 years old when he joined. I'm just gonna believe she's a lying thief

you miss the point as he told her that and she would have no way of knowing any different she would have no option but to stop things there for legal reasons,

True there are different sides to the story and we’re only seeing one but considering what these babes are like overall I’m inclined to believe the bloke.

But if she did over a refund then the question remains, why refuse it?? Especially when it was evident he wasn’t getting what he paid for.

This sort of thing just makes it complicated to workout which babes aren’t on the make and which are. This for me stems from there dislike ultimate of the “customers”. We’re all sad sap weirdos with no life and have to pay to get are kicks in there view.

(19-08-2018 14:20 )winsaw Wrote:  think there could be a bit of spin going on here, not all the messages have been shown, so i talked to Kiki about it as there are 2 sides to everything and here are some of the points she made,

she offered Joeeeeee a full refund after his first post on here he refused and said her didn't want the money,

he sent her abusive threatening messages which dont appear in the time line he has shown,

he told her that if she sent him the video he was going to upload it on to porn hub,

also he admitted to her that he is under 18 years old, at this point she told him he would not be getting the video as she not sending porn to kids,

so quite a different take on things and maybe not everything Joeeeeee said here should be taken as gospel,

That’s good to hear Kiki’s side of things & yes it is a different take on things and not on what Joeeeee has apparently done including threats a blackmail & if true she was right to not do the video.

But given how Kiki blocked me on twitter even though I was only tweeting her about her nightshows, I’m still inclined to believe Joeeeee I’m afraid in this now very confusing saga

I am genuinely laughing at that guy who’s posted about kikis side. I haven’t deleted any side of the convo at all the only thing I took out was a screenshot of my bank details showing I’d paid her.

I read the screenshots back, I ask her for a refund and she clearly states “I don’t do refunds”

As for the under 18 excuse that’s pathetic I’m fucking 30 ?? genuinely that’s her response to acting how she’s acted and getting called out on it? That’s hilarious. The girl is an absolute fraud and a crook.

Read the convo again as I say, she flat out tells me no repeatedly to a refund. If I was under 18 where the fuck would I be getting £100 from too?

Absolute joke of a woman I swear to god.

(19-08-2018 16:06 )babefan2012 Wrote:  But if she did over a refund then the question remains, why refuse it?? Especially when it was evident he wasn’t getting what he paid for.

That's the bit I really don't get, I would think the hole reason for starting this little thread was to get his money back, and it worked, all he had to do was remove his comments on here after he got the money, but he's refused it, so it's seams to be more important to give her a bad reputation, which is hole different thing,

And no offence to winsaw but you’re a complete mark for believing that nonsense. As I say the convo is there, I think apart from the first 2 screenshots the convo is actually in running order, it’s all coherent and makes sense my replies to her and hers to mine etc.

Don’t buy into her bullshit. And as for Kiki if you can look yourself in the mirror after stealing money off someone then more power to you, you obviously need the money more than I do

I haven’t had any money back off her. It doesn’t make sense because she’s lying to you ffs lol

(19-08-2018 16:56 )winsaw Wrote:  

(19-08-2018 16:06 )babefan2012 Wrote:  But if she did over a refund then the question remains, why refuse it?? Especially when it was evident he wasn’t getting what he paid for.

That's the bit I really don't get, I would think the hole reason for starting this little thread was to get his money back, and it worked, all he had to do was remove his comments on here after he got the money, but he's refused it, so it's seams to be more important to give her a bad reputation, which is hole different thing,

That’s the last message I had off her and that was after I’d made my first post simply asking if anyone has had problems with her customers before.

(19-08-2018 16:59 )Joeeeeee Wrote:  I haven’t had any money back off her. It doesn’t make sense because she’s lying to you ffs lol

So are you saying that she didn't offer u a full refund in return for removing your comments on here last week, and that you refused this ?