Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion

(18-07-2015 12:29 )DB83 Wrote:  Hmmn.

Kara is now saying that one of the people behind this was done for embezzlement. His assets are frozen so there is zilch chance of anyone getting money out of this.

My boxset for tonight is 'Chancer'

Where's kara said this? Would explain sin's sudden collapse yesterday. Beth had tweeted saying she would be on sin tonight, yet within hours came the news sin had shut down (presumably when this person's assets were frozen) and babes were suddenly told to go and get their stuff.

Does seem unlikely now the sin babes & those working will get any money they are owed.

Expect 942 will dissapear from the epg anytime now. Wonder what will happen to it? I think either s66 will take it back or rlc will return to sky

I hope RLC comes back.

^^
Second that tractor

(18-07-2015 13:14 )mr mystery Wrote:  But new company's must assure Ofcom finances are available to them when and if required to broadcast programs and all it entails.

Which they would have been able to do very easily. They had money to burn when they started. It wasn't only the girls who were on high wages and perks. One of the girls told me there was even a chef employed there to cook meals for them. Quite incredible.

Anything required by Ofcom would have been fine, as Sin TV would have passed with flying colours. A piece of cake, as they say.

^don't all the channels have personal chefs cooking for the girls?

(18-07-2015 13:36 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  

(18-07-2015 12:29 )DB83 Wrote:  Hmmn.

Kara is now saying that one of the people behind this was done for embezzlement. His assets are frozen so there is zilch chance of anyone getting money out of this.

My boxset for tonight is 'Chancer'

Where's kara said this?

Webcam freechat.

Clear also that they have looked in to the possibility of recovering what is due to them and this info came to light.

(18-07-2015 14:05 )terence Wrote:  ^don't all the channels have personal chefs cooking for the girls?

Sure. And the mayonnaise is free

(18-07-2015 01:03 )admiral decker Wrote:  

(17-07-2015 23:26 )De La Red Wrote:  alleged questionable ethics/intentions

They didn't have any questionable ethics/intentions. That kind of talk is nonsense. They simply didn't know what they were doing.

As bigglesworth posted, Sin TV had just the one EPG slot and a low one at that, so how could they ever have managed to pay such a high wagebill? The answer must be that they thought the x-streams would bring calls rolling in, and that was obviously a horrendous error of judgement.

That is why I used the word 'alleged'. So to dismiss the post as nonsense, is actually nonsense.

It's a good job NCIS ain't on the case,

Jethro Gibbs and Di Nozo would be thinking.... did a "fictional babe channel" know they were going to be shut down - after they were off air the first time - and decided to sign up a "fictional babe Beff" and persuade a couple of other "fictional already employed girls" to go back so that "the fictional babe channel" could bag the money before it's "fictional assets" were frozen.

Mmmmmmm

(18-07-2015 11:34 )kevin symons Wrote:  A lot of people are claiming that Sin TV is finished and about to fold, but I don't think that's certain (not yet anyway). If they could find additional investment they could still pull through and survive couldn't they (with a new realistic wagebill of course)? I don't now how easy it would be find new investment, but maybe it's premature to say they are certain to be gone.

They could survive, but when you sign what you think is the "best girls" in the industry and then don't pay them, word spreads, twice in a month they've had problems and gone off air now, will any more of the girls trust them? mind you... some of them may not be the brightest and Beth I think was in the paper for being a brain box with her studies etc and they managed to get her over onto the Sin TV.