HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread

(Yesterday 20:52 )lovebabes56 Wrote:  

(Yesterday 20:41 )Charlemagne Wrote:  ^It's surprising how many of the girls meet the date criteria.
Charlie C started on Babestation way before the start of the forum. So she been a babe for at least 19 years.

I'm wondering if there are others (who we have probably all forgotten about), who go back a little bit further than Charlie.

As for Rebecca Kelly (now Honey Gold) I think it was pretty much to the strength of her performances and her personality that got her nominated that year, and don't forget she was a multiple winner of forum comps too at the time.

Yes, don't get me wrong, I absolutely LOVED Rebecca on Studio 66 - especially the glorious tease shows. I fully supported her sweeping the board for all awards of the year she was eligible for. She was a tantalising, charming delight.

I do think she has dropped off now and stands out less. I like to look across a long span to weigh up HoF entry. Being great over a long period is what it's about IMO.

Remembering her S66 days fondly.

Love the nomination of Sophia, B!

Is Kelly Bell classed as daybabe or a night babe in this award

^^ If you are unsure Rammy just vote for her in both.

As good as they were, Kelly didn't really do enough nights to warrant an induction alone, but if you add those shows to the 3 or 4 years of days then it's a fine body of work.

A vote for Kelly almost feels like a wasted vote as recency bias counts against her & other babes from year ago due to the knockout process which puts them head to head with more familiar babes from the recent past & a significant proportion of this forum will just vote for the babe that they have actually seen live & not for one who has retired from the shows who they have never seen. The format is unfair to these babes.

Kelly Bell is the best daybabe ever, by a country mile in terms of looks, outfits & the best phone conversation you could wish to have. It's a travesty of justice that she wasn't inducted year ago & I will keep banging my drum until it happens. The fact that it hasn't already undermines the whole integrity of the HOF.

I'm glad I've got that off my chest.

(Today 00:03 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote:  A vote for Kelly almost feels like a wasted vote as recency bias counts against her & other babes from year ago due to the knockout process which puts them head to head with more familiar babes from the recent past & a significant proportion of this forum will just vote for the babe that they have actually seen live & not for one who has retired from the shows who they have never seen. The format is unfair to these babes.

Totally agree. I've said it before, the Hall Of Fame should be spared the knockout competition treatment. Like other HoFs, should be decided a panel of 'experts' who know the shows more than most. And induct a good handful of babes each year say half a dozen or more. We'll all be pushing up daisies lol nominating 1 or 2 a year before those who should be recognised eventually get inducted

Now that's off my chest too