The UK Babe Channels Forum
Tits, Legs or Arse? - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Babe Polls & Surveys (/forumdisplay.php?fid=410)
+---- Thread: Tits, Legs or Arse? (/showthread.php?tid=3995)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7


RE: Tits, Legs or Arse? - Rivers - 15-02-2009 15:20

It's legs all the way for all me especially if they're completed by a sexy pair of heels!


RE: Tits, Legs or Arse? - Gaz "AV1" Aston - 16-02-2009 12:35

Legs for me aswell but does spoil it a bit if they have great legs and a saggy arse Tongue


RE: Tits, Legs or Arse? - steven6 - 16-02-2009 15:24

astonv1 Wrote:Legs for me aswell but does spoil it a bit if they have great legs and a saggy arse Tongue

you mean like this? Tongue


RE: Tits, Legs or Arse? - Gaz "AV1" Aston - 16-02-2009 15:25

LOL Tongue Exactly!!!!


RE: Tits, Legs or Arse? - jungleboy - 16-02-2009 15:42

Arse for me, I'ts great to look at, and you can never get spotted by her when your having a look! Nothing better than seeing a bird walking down the street with a lovely arse.


RE: Tits, Legs or Arse? - Mister Gummidge - 16-02-2009 18:50

I voted arse, as it's the only one you can check without being spotted and it can also be the saving grace on a woman who's otherwise not to your taste... How many times have you found yourself looking at a woman, she's flat chested, has a slight paunch and a face like a melted welly? You think, "Good Lord! Nature can be downright cruel to some people!" Then she turns around to walk away and there it is! A backside that most other women would kill for, proving once and for all that while your genes take with one hand, they give back with other. The backside is nature's way of showing that there's no such thing as a truly ugly woman!Big Grin Mind you, the other two options are wonderful things as well... As is my own little quirk, the neck and shoulders. Oh, and hips! Don't forget bellies, either. Or that little patch of flesh where the leg, hip and groin join together! It's all good really... Except feetSad Never saw the attraction there - Different strokes, eh?


RE: Tits, Legs or Arse? - G@Z! - 16-02-2009 18:52

i have always liked the deirriere i hope that is spelt correctly lol Big Grin


RE: Tits, Legs or Arse? - cherryryder - 16-02-2009 20:05

mr gummidge Wrote:I voted arse, as it's the only one you can check without being spotted and it can also be the saving grace on a woman who's otherwise not to your taste... How many times have you found yourself looking at a woman, she's flat chested, has a slight paunch and a face like a melted welly? You think, "Good Lord! Nature can be downright cruel to some people!" Then she turns around to walk away and there it is! A backside that most other women would kill for, proving once and for all that while your genes take with one hand, they give back with other. The backside is nature's way of showing that there's no such thing as a truly ugly woman!Big Grin Mind you, the other two options are wonderful things as well... As is my own little quirk, the neck and shoulders. Oh, and hips! Don't forget bellies, either. Or that little patch of flesh where the leg, hip and groin join together! It's all good really... Except feetSad Never saw the attraction there - Different strokes, eh?

Haha! So true!


RE: Tits, Legs or Arse? - watty - 18-02-2009 00:26

You can't beat a nice arse, I have no preference to the size of the boobs as I like both big and small, but I do like a nice botty.

Smile


RE: Tits, Legs or Arse? - toffeemen - 18-02-2009 20:48

I think this justifies my choice of arse


[attachment=3291][attachment=3292]