+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+--- Forum: All Other Subjects (/forumdisplay.php?fid=114)
+---- Forum: TV & Film Zone (/forumdisplay.php?fid=79)
+---- Thread: Dr Who (/showthread.php?tid=18822)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223
RE: Dr Who - ShandyHand - 03-06-2025 17:33
He left because the show's future is very doubtful. No way an actor (especially one on the way to global recognition) would bank on it. The show's future is in doubt because Disney got nothing from it in return for their finamcial outlay. (The BBC have no money and can't afford the show's costs on their own any longer.) Disney got nothing from it because those running Who began writing it exclusively for themselves and their bluesky-type bubble, not the general public. Hence the show is as popular with the public as a fart in a spacesuit! (Streamer platforms like Disney expect decent viewer numbers far more than the beeb does.)
Who was always somewhat niche, but at its best it took the wider public's toleramce with it with a good-natured quirkiness. Lectures every week are not good-natured, they're sneery. And that's what Who became... sneery and intolerant of any naunced views; ironic in a show that previously had always stood for the exact opposite. It needs to go away for a while and come back run by people more tolerant to its original nature.
RE: Dr Who - lovebabes56 - 03-06-2025 19:42
It needs a total re - think from those who write downwards, the only way who could survive if it was written by people with a deep love of the show as it once was and a deep love of science fiction. Whoever now takes the show on needs to insist on the messaging to stop and concentrate on making it a proper science fiction show, but now having read your post Shandy I fear there is very little appetite left for it and there is no room for it on screen anymore.
RE: Dr Who - lovebabes56 - 03-06-2025 20:24
(01-06-2025 11:58 )KerrAvon Wrote: ^You could say so, although depends by what metric I guess. Colin Baker only had 2 full seasons too, although had his first story at end of Davison's last season. Paul McGann only had the one story/movie (untill a webisode years later). Was he essentially the Doctor until the reboot years laters?
That got me thinking - did they ever do a regeneration from him as the Doctor to Christopher Ecclestone - or not?
RE: Dr Who - Sm© - 03-06-2025 22:29
(03-06-2025 20:24 )lovebabes56 Wrote: did they ever do a regeneration from him as the Doctor to Christopher Ecclestone - or not?
Paul McGann regenerated to John Hurt, John Hurt regenerated to Christopher Eccleston.
RE: Dr Who - *Kal-El* - 04-06-2025 18:47
The Season 2 finale as well as the rest of season was filmed a year ago. Apparently the ending wasn’t the original ending and was reshot, there is picture currently doing the rounds which you can easily find. The person the doctor regenerates into (not spoiling in case no one has seen it yet ) apparently was shot recently. As I said in my previous post it’s looking more and more like he left because of the uncertain future of the show.
There’s possibly tell tale signs of the reshoots look at Rubys hair when she’s in the Tardis with the Doctor and Belinda but check her when they arrive back Unit and notice her hair is different lol.