+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV Daytime (formerly Elite TV Daytime) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=266)
+----- Forum: Former Studio 66 Daytime babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=312)
+----- Thread: Caitlin Wynters - Chat & Discussion (Only) (/showthread.php?tid=77688)
RE: Caitlin Wynters - Chat & Non-Babeshow Pics - 199lives - 26-11-2011 18:42
the point is Caitlin is making comments about this place on twitter, if she has a problem with this forum why not address them here, in a moderated environment. Instead she's on twitter making whiney attention seeking posts about whats being said on the forum.
RE: Caitlin Wynters - Chat & Non-Babeshow Pics - beardedbob - 26-11-2011 18:51
(26-11-2011 18:00 )eagle_si Wrote: If that really was all you did, there probably wouldn't have been such a reaction, as you did after all concede that it might actually depend on the caller. But it was the "should try having a real job" jibe which REALLY got her back up.
As for commenting on Twitter and not here, Caitlin's got nearly 8,000 followers on Twitter, which is far more than the number of people who read this thread. Anyway most of the people who read this and are interested in her follow her on there anyway.
that comment was not specifically aimed at caitlin but a more general comment and was a response to your assertion that appearing on these channels can be incredibly tiring. i just don't see it. maybe i'm wrong.
RE: Caitlin Wynters - Chat & Non-Babeshow Pics - Boomerangutangangbang - 26-11-2011 19:31
Does smack of double standards as the largely unmoderated Twitter has a whole army of "babe haters" In the main we're much better behaved on here.
RE: Caitlin Wynters - Chat & Non-Babeshow Pics - gazfc - 27-11-2011 00:35
(26-11-2011 19:31 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote: Does smack of double standards as the largely unmoderated Twitter has a whole army of "babe haters" In the main we're much better behaved on here.
Is easier to block people on twitter and reaches a larger audience but in general the girls are slightly better protected on here.......well unless you work for elite that is
RE: Caitlin Wynters - Chat & Non-Babeshow Pics - bi11ythekid - 27-11-2011 00:59
I'm off to Afghanistan very soon and there's still no way I'd swap to have to do her job. God knows who she has to speak to and has to smile all the bloody time, it's like being an air hostess for 12 hours except you have to put up with all the crap on social networking sites.
RE: Caitlin Wynters - Chat & Non-Babeshow Pics - Chilly - 27-11-2011 01:09
Not really, 'cause she's not being forced to read what's said on here or any other site, just like she's not being forced to work on these channels. If all Caitlin has to worry about is a couple of comments that get made on this forum, well, she has one very easy life.
RE: Caitlin Wynters - Chat & Non-Babeshow Pics - bi11ythekid - 27-11-2011 01:15
We'll have to agree to disagree.
RE: Caitlin Wynters - Chat & Non-Babeshow Pics - wasteofspace - 27-11-2011 02:03
It's okay for babes on the babeshows i.e catilin wynters to wave her phone when there are no callers to ask people like me and others on the forum to call her to make her money, but its not okay if we feel she was disrespectful in some sort of way to say something about it.
If caitlin had no callers while at work what would happen???
I owe caitlin wynters nothin at all
I HAVE NO INTEREST IN HER JOB DESCRIPTION she choose to do the job she is doing not me, yes i admit some callers can be an handful at times but all she does is stretch out on a bed having a phone to her ears all day, so i think she should'nt be complaining consider how easy it is 
.As far as twitter goes 8000 friends
only 25% of those people are genuine people she has met in person and knows very well who are her real friends, the otha 75% are fake so 8000 followers means nothin you have any tom dick & harry following you on Twitter especially with the babes people they dont even know and who they don't even speak too 
.And it is expected negativity at times but you rise above it pay no attention
some people on here needs to get a grip
RE: Caitlin Wynters - Chat & Non-Babeshow Pics - Roquentin - 27-11-2011 02:51
Sometimes showing a bit of reality is kind of interesting, I've certainly seen her enjoying herself chatting with callers.
Oh and if Caitlin does read this, join in anytime. *waves at Caitlin* Best not to start with a heavy rant though. Let it slide off you.
RE: Caitlin Wynters - Chat & Non-Babeshow Pics - eagle_si - 27-11-2011 07:34
Congratulations wasteofspace. You've made the most ignorant post yet since this discussion, for want of a better word, started, and that's quite some achievement.
Let's destroy your points one by one. First of all, IF she was disrespectful in any way (and so far there’s no evidence apart from one person saying so on Friday) then it’s pretty simple. Don’t call her. You’re not being forced to.
You owe Caitlin nothing at all. And guess what? She owes you nothing at all as well. So you’re even. As for the bit about how easy it is, well that just goes to show how totally clueless you are.
Now, your Twitter remark. I’m one of Caitlin’s followers. I haven’t met her in person (I suspect your 25% figure is way too high) but that doesn’t mean I’m a “fake”. And she actually takes time to reply to messages people send. I know this from experience.
Yes some people do need to get a grip, but I suspect the ones you’re thinking about are not the same ones I’m thinking about.
And before I finish, I find it particularly sad that the poster who started this thread, has spoken to Caitlin and has her in his top ten list, thanked your post.