^ If I may be so bold: I suspect the key phrase of your critique of the critic here is the "something you could get elsewhere" bit. There are assumptions in that don't you think? Viz: Are you sure you know what it is about his interactions that gives Snooks pleasure? Sure his post explained eloquently (as always) what he looks for in a babe when he's spending but...
1. As you say, he's said little (this time) on why he (still) chooses to come to the channels for his adult entertainments (rather than taking his leisure spending elsewhere)... And...
2. Why he chooses the
type of spend he does once he's on there (punters tend to favour one or two forms of spending on the shows way more than the others in my experience)....
With his criteria at best unspoken - here anyways - how you can conclude so firmly that Snooks could get the same pleasures elsewhere? Certain aspects of the shows - despite their poor general reputation among many including myself - remain solidly unique. I can't say otherwise even disliking many current trends about the shows. Things like
the evocative spark the live nature of the shows can bring; the cumulative rush of multi-user 'pile on'; or the drive to help create something that brings approval from viewing peers. These are things not easily replicated elsewhere even now. (If I could find enough of these things foregrounded to my tastes I'd still be using the channels.)
So I feel it highly likely the contary to what you say is true. Especially when you get to Snooks' tastes... From a longterm reading on this forum and much personal correspondence with him, I think I know a little of what Snooks would answer to these two questions. So, I feel he'd be genuinely hard pushed to find similar satisfactions elsewhere (even in the unlikely event he could find someone of Beth's qualities in another sphere).
In any case, I'm sure he'll be along to elucidate further, for himself
, shortly.