Studio66 & OnlyFans

(20-12-2018 16:48 )Rake Wrote:  What percentage of tips does OF cream off the top?

20% if i remember correctly

Thanks.

(20-12-2018 16:12 )Davy Crockett Wrote:  

(20-12-2018 16:03 )Unscarreduk Wrote:  If the girls are self employed coudn't S66 have just got rid of the ones they didnt want?

Of course they could.

They can stop giving shifts to any girl at any time. They are always letting girls go.

I have no specific intell on what happened here, and will admit that when required -
unlike some.

But Winsaw feels on the right lines to me. The way something is done is often half the battle. Then too, the message of what occured remains despite any subsequent climb down on terms.

There's also the truism that initial main intent and being content with the eventual outcome are not always founded in the same thing.

(20-12-2018 15:42 )winsaw Wrote:  the hole thing was a big wage cutting exercise,

This is a way-out fantasy to put it mildly.

Even the most hardened conspiracy theorist is going to find it difficult to swallow this one.

Whilst I'm not too disappointed with the presenters that left S66, and relatively happy with their new hosts.

This OF situation has highlighted that the most important thing at a channel is their roster.

Channels and presenters need to stop demonising "freeloaders" and putting everything behind a paywall.

They can't keep bleeding their current customer base dry with high cost and low quality content.

The UK Babe Channels Forum was first online on 26-07-2008 at 16:16

We currently have 56,190 members registered.

The most users online at one time was 1,813 on 04-12-2012 at 00:19

The most users online in one day was 26,918 on 31-12-2012 at 01:30

It's been 6 years since the forum hit it's peak, the channels and hosts need to work harder on generating new fans.

(20-12-2018 16:37 )winsaw Wrote:  

(20-12-2018 16:12 )Davy Crockett Wrote:  Of course they could.

They can stop giving shifts to any girl at any time. They are always letting girls go.

very true but from what i have been told they didn't want to been seen to be letting a large number of top preforming girls go all at once,
it looks far better if the girls chose to leave them self's, dont look like a wage cutting measure and looks a lot better to girls who are thinking of working there,

Yes, because everybody wants to work for a company where the current 'employees' are tripping over themselves to get out the door

better than girls berating them on twitter saying they lost all of there hours sparking rumours that they are going bust. which would lead them to getting no new girls and really going bust

I’m sorry to say this but whilst Winsaw has provided good information in the past I’m inclined to take anything he says criticising a company with a pinch of salt now. His commentary is so biased towards VNTV that it sadly brings into question his independence and how his sources use him.

You can’t be the forum spokesperson for VNTV and an impartial industry commentator.

I agree, winsaw has developed a credibility problem. I think this wage cutting theory is going to be held against him for a long time.

I was going to point out how feeble his 'looks better if girls are leaving' argument is, but I see The Silent Majority beat me to it.

(21-12-2018 02:19 )admiral decker Wrote:  This is a way-out fantasy to put it mildly.

Even the most hardened conspiracy theorist is going to find it difficult to swallow this one.

Only counter I would give to that is that my wife has worked for a number of small businesses and the unbelievable contortions they pull to either avoid direct confrontation with staff or admit they have problems are numerous.

You may be applying your own standards to how the ladies were engaged, rather than someone elses