Studio66 & OnlyFans

(20-12-2018 09:43 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  Seems odd to climb down now, just when you'd think they'd worked through it.

Most of the babes who didn't want to conform have bailed and you'd assume the replacements would accept the new rules before deciding to sign on.

Looks like all the grief's been for nothing

Yeah it does seem odd for s66 to back/climb down now. Interesting to see why s66 have suddenly made this u-turn.

At least this saga has seen s66 roster be revamped with plenty of new faces on both days & nights

Wouldn't surprise me if Mourinho style managerial changes are in the pipe - line. Does seem odd they kicked up shit about the girls use of Only Fans during shows when the girls saw it as a possible marketing/business innovation that could have possibly brought in new callers and revenue for s66 and then they do this U-turn. Certainly does seem eventually like girl power won out and the fiasco was for nothing. S66 does more U - turns than Mrs May's Government!!

(20-12-2018 09:58 )RutgerWhore Wrote:  I'm guessing the girls who left won't be returning any time soon though

We can but hope. 90% of them are no great loss IMO and most of the replacements are at worst the same, but at best a big upgrade.

Unless it wasnt about the onlyfans afterall and they just wanted to trim down the wages bill

^^ been doing some asking round today and that seams to be what everyone is saying, the hole thing was a big wage cutting exercise,
seams that Lucy Zara was never asked to give up OF but told had time as things where being worked out, i was told Lola was never told she had to stop her OF when she signed,
looks like they had decided which girls they wanted to move on and now its done have put OF back on the table as a reward to those who did as they where told and to help sign new girls,
i guess when times are hard and a channel is not making much at all anything goes if it keeps the channel going,

I just wanna know when I can see Hannah Martin's gigantic ass on my TV again. I can't handle these booty withdrawals for much longer. Morale is low, hope is fading, but a sliver of faith still remains that one day I will be reacquainted with that glorious derriere and all will be right in the world.

(20-12-2018 15:42 )winsaw Wrote:  ^^ been doing some asking round today and that seams to be what everyone is saying, the hole thing was a big wage cutting exercise,
seams that Lucy Zara was never asked to give up OF but told had time as things where being worked out, i was told Lola was never told she had to stop her OF when she signed,
looks like they had decided which girls they wanted to move on and now its done have put OF back on the table as a reward to those who did as they where told and to help sign new girls,
i guess when times are hard and a channel is not making much at all anything goes if it keeps the channel going,

If the girls are self employed coudn't S66 have just got rid of the ones they didnt want?

Not a surprise bout the nightshow performers being treated differently as their isn't as much talent on there as it is. Might have ended up with one girl a night if the same amount had left.

(20-12-2018 16:03 )Unscarreduk Wrote:  If the girls are self employed coudn't S66 have just got rid of the ones they didnt want?

Of course they could.

They can stop giving shifts to any girl at any time. They are always letting girls go.

(20-12-2018 16:12 )Davy Crockett Wrote:  Of course they could.

They can stop giving shifts to any girl at any time. They are always letting girls go.

very true but from what i have been told they didn't want to been seen to be letting a large number of top preforming girls go all at once,
it looks far better if the girls chose to leave them self's, dont look like a wage cutting measure and looks a lot better to girls who are thinking of working there,

What percentage of tips does OF cream off the top?