Do we bomb Syria and Islamic State?

Has bombing on its own, ever won a war? Seems Cameron wants to be seen as the tough leader. After his refusal to apologise for his stupid comments about anyone voting against bombing Syria, just shows what a fucktard he really is

So parliament has voted for airsrikes on Syria. Should be plenty of profit for Cameron and the moneymen. Seems politicians cant get anything right. Just not in my name Cameron.

(02-12-2015 23:52 )lancealot790 Wrote:  The moment we begin bombing Syria it will be the signal for them to attack us.

So they don't mind us bombing them in Iraq and refuse to attack us until we start bombing them in Syria? That's your argument?

5 years down the line another inquiry (which will not see the light of day) why we went to 'war' against Isil.

But I just wonder where all the dough for these weapons comes from. Government spending gets cut to the bone yet they always find the cash for this.

The US and Kermit have been bombing for months now. The US are relatively safe from these extremists - they have enough of their own (today's shootings illustrate that well enough) and we see all to well what has happened in France. It will happen here even without these actions. Just makes their own excuse more justifiable.

I am not making any argument simply stating the blindingly obvious, the UK bombing Syria would be the signal for their fighters to launch an attack on this country. We have been fighting in Iraq a long time, this latest move would in the twisted mind of any terrorist organisation be an escalation of the conflict.

(03-12-2015 00:44 )DB83 Wrote:  5 years down the line another inquiry (which will not see the light of day) why we went to 'war' against Isil.

But I just wonder where all the dough for these weapons comes from. Government spending gets cut to the bone yet they always find the cash for this.

The US and Kermit have been bombing for months now. The US are relatively safe from these extremists - they have enough of their own (today's shootings illustrate that well enough) and we see all to well what has happened in France. It will happen here even without these actions. Just makes their own excuse more justifiable.

There is always money for war and foreign aid.

(03-12-2015 00:50 )lancealot790 Wrote:  the UK bombing Syria would be the signal for their fighters to launch an attack on this country.

Why do they need this signal when we're bombing them already?

And just how long do we keep bombing Syria?? Until Cameron and co are voted out, or the moneymen tell Cameron to stop, weve made enough profits now. Been some shitty politicians through the ages, but i think Cameron is as bad as there has ever been. Britain needs a strong leader, maybee some day we will have one.

66 Labour MP's voted with the government in vote. Stan Collymore is so disgusted he has cancelled his Labour membership and joined the SNP

What so a multi millionaire girlfriend beater leaves the party not a great loss

Would he have been so anti if those 3 suicide bombers had suceeded and got inside the stade de france on the night of the paris attacks and murdered french & german football fans.