Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 12 Vote(s) - 3.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion

Author Message
Joey 27 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 7,110
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 60
Post: #2481
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
Its a poor line up tonight anyway, even if they were putting on a good show on the x stream i doubt this thread would be buzzing tbh, roll on June when they are supposedly signing up more babes
(This post was last modified: 28-05-2015 01:59 by Joey 27.)
28-05-2015 01:58
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
richpk Offline
Master Poster
****

Posts: 647
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 9
Post: #2482
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
(28-05-2015 01:58 )Joey 27 Wrote:  Its a poor line up tonight anyway, even if they were putting on a good show on the x stream i doubt this thread would be buzzing tbh, roll on June when they are supposedly signing up more babes

its not just tonight tho

the have completely screwed up from the get go. they still have no idea what they are doing with the few ladies they have now, what they gonna do with even more to juggle with???

i dont blame the ladies, its the people running this crap
28-05-2015 02:03
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
broncobilly10 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 4,662
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 39
Post: #2483
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
The problems with this channel are all production the girls are great. Some girls don't have total cross over appeal and they cater to a particular type of person but we need those too.

Sin really need to get some professional running the thing end of.
28-05-2015 08:41
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ShandyHand Offline
No Paywall Onlys - not babeshows
*****

Posts: 3,973
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 65
Post: #2484
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
^ Agree on they have got the spy cam thing all wrong. Yet again Sin have tried to implement the right idea and completely missed the point(s):

1. If you are going to imply something as eroticly voyeuristic make sure it is! Get in closer ffs. It can even be a mostly static shot if you must and have to make the girls do all the work but tell whoever to make sure it's offering MORE than the censored TV feed.

2. This is supposed to be driving business to your website. At least have the thing occassionally visible on your TV feed to indicate it's operating! Intrigue the viewer to find out more and then tell your callers what they are missing out on. No need to advertise directly onscreen just a little product placement you might say.

If you are going to nick ideas at least do them with conviction and thought!

The idea that the babeshows "are not that deep" is driven by those that don't wish to acknowledge how much effective customer service and a consideration of psychology impacts users' future interactions.
(This post was last modified: 28-05-2015 11:29 by ShandyHand.)
28-05-2015 11:26
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HEX!T Away
Retired
*****

Posts: 6,298
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 143
Post: #2485
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
yep. i only realised that s66 were doing daytime cams when i saw the girls using it while they were taking calls.
no advertising. i just saw it and it was enough to get me to go to there site.
all they have to do is put the spy cam in 1 or 2 shots as they move the main cam around. this should peak interest enough to get guys to look on the site to see if its an active cam.

Any Babe pics posted are my Take on existing photographs. credits for the original images stays with the copyright holder if any rights apply.

Today im wearing a gray hat. tomorrow it might be white or black, it depends on my mood
(This post was last modified: 28-05-2015 12:23 by HEX!T.)
28-05-2015 12:22
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RESPONSIBLE ADULT Offline
Banned

Posts: 898
Joined: Jun 2010
Post: #2486
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
As crap as this Sin tv is, and it is very crap. It must still cost a tidy sum to put together, wages, rents. equipment, etc,etc. Who are the balm pots who finance this enterprise, and why can they not see that the staff they have running it. have not got a fucking clue. And by the staff, i also include the models. Models who will gladly show all anywhere, but wont do such a thing when asked by Sin tv.
If the people who did the hiring thought they were getting the cream of the crop when they hired these models, then that just shows how fucking inept they really are.
From Babestation to S66 from Red Light Central to Expanded tv, the whole damn lot need to be scrapped and out of the ashes create something what merits being called an adult show, But first all the deadwood needs to be raked out, the fear as to go. and a more streamlined edition created. an edition that will fight its corner regarding censorship.
But why the fuck should that happen when you still find men with trembly voices on the phone, worshipping these girls and gladly paying for it.
28-05-2015 18:16
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HEX!T Away
Retired
*****

Posts: 6,298
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 143
Post: #2487
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
man i cant beat that logic.
Bounce

Any Babe pics posted are my Take on existing photographs. credits for the original images stays with the copyright holder if any rights apply.

Today im wearing a gray hat. tomorrow it might be white or black, it depends on my mood
28-05-2015 20:09
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
broncobilly10 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 4,662
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 39
Post: #2488
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
The other night they left the Mic running as a on screen girl was talking and one of the off screen girls was getting busy making all sorts of nice noise. They do have a nice time off screen just wish they would bring some heat to the screen instead of the no fun rule they impose on screen.

Again shoddy production
28-05-2015 20:14
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mrmann Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 15,880
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 92
Post: #2489
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
^ Doesn't surprise me, as many of us here know what goes on at these studios from time to time. I used to hear a lot of backstage moaning from studio 66, sometimes with certain women looking off screen with either a cheeky grin, or an unhappy turned off expression.

Kandi Kay (AKA "You all have no idea what goes on behind the scenes") was heard moaning loudly a month or so back when not on screen, but when she returned she claimed she was on a call during her break. Possible? Yes, but I suspect sometimes this is a cover, so that we don't realize sex is actually taking place laugh. I doubt the women are always on calls during their entire breaks, when they want to relax, eat some food, maybe shower or watch a bit of TV. When there is only moaning, but no dirty talk, then that also gives me the vibe that some actual activity is taking place, not a call.

I think Sin TV would benefit from some naughty POV sessions!
(This post was last modified: 28-05-2015 20:49 by mrmann.)
28-05-2015 20:18
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HEX!T Away
Retired
*****

Posts: 6,298
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 143
Post: #2490
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
yeah you do get the impression the girls are having more fun off screen sometimes. i guess if they showed that and became less formal about the x-stream sets. switch to go pros or something like it...
woohaa theres an idea....
Bounce
watching pov as some hairy ass'd producer bangs your fav on screen babe.eek.. erm! i think il stick with the fantasy lol...

Any Babe pics posted are my Take on existing photographs. credits for the original images stays with the copyright holder if any rights apply.

Today im wearing a gray hat. tomorrow it might be white or black, it depends on my mood
28-05-2015 20:31
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply