Channel closure conspiracy thread

(25-02-2015 22:25 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  Exactly, so why would they not want to?

Given that tweeting is the easiest promotional medium they have. And it costs nothing.

You would need to tell us, I think.

Do you have a conspiracy theory to share?

(25-02-2015 22:14 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote:  So anyway what's the favoured conspiracy theory then

(25-02-2015 22:33 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote:  Do you have a conspiracy theory to share?

When forum royalty invokes 'conspiracy theory' twice in 20 minutes, you know there's a cover-up going on

(25-02-2015 22:33 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote:  You would need to tell us, I think.

It wasn't a rhetorical question.

The strange thing is, that everyone slated the show when it was on and said how terrible it was.

Then it gets axed and people seem surprised, probably the same people who said how terrible it was.

(25-02-2015 22:14 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote:  So anyway what's the favoured conspiracy theory then that people want to use to explain the channel's demise?

I watched enough of that show to know that it does not need any conspiracy theory to explain its demise.

But I assume that mr mystery didn't think the show was that bad, if he's demanding a greater explanation.

Prince Henry, I don't have your conspiracy theory but I do happen to know what went wrong......

It turns out that all the girls featured on ETV were actually robots. Cellcast were informed that the circuitry was of a quality German build, however, once the cheap Chinese circuitry began to fail (they wouldn't dance correctly) the game was up and Cellcast were furious.

Now you know.

(25-02-2015 23:47 )dominar rygel xvi Wrote:  I watched enough of that show to know that it does not need any conspiracy theory to explain its demise.

But I assume that mr mystery didn't think the show was that bad, if he's demanding a greater explanation.

You assume wrong, the Sky broadcast was mostly pretty bad imo, neither am i "demanding" a greater explanation, i asked questions ..

If anyone hasn't seen what ETV have said concerning them not being on Sky, then check this post, DB83 has posted it in full here http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...pid1626702

It's a bit different and more long winded than what admin posted lol

(26-02-2015 00:50 )mr mystery Wrote:  what ETV have said concerning them not being on Sky

Nowhere in that reply that impressed you so much do ETV deny that Cellcast ended the service. They just avoid giving a direct answer.

I can see why their evasiveness would impress a conspiracy theorist such as yourself, but it doesn't impress me.

They talk around the subject, as though considering their future options, whilst carefully avoiding the specific question that was asked.

As someone who has followed ETV for some time, I can say their reputation is one of being not very accurate with their statements.

Ask anyone else who has followed them long enough and I'm sure you will get the same viewpoint. Their reputation precedes them.

(25-02-2015 23:47 )dominar rygel xvi Wrote:  

(25-02-2015 22:14 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote:  So anyway what's the favoured conspiracy theory then that people want to use to explain the channel's demise?

I watched enough of that show to know that it does not need any conspiracy theory to explain its demise.

But I assume that mr mystery didn't think the show was that bad, if he's demanding a greater explanation.

There is no conspiracy theory about it's demise. It's obvious why it failed, it was crap and probably got no calls. I don't think anyone's disputing that.

The question being posed (that's 'question', not 'conspiracy theory', for it to be a conspiracy theory there actually has to be a theory), that you and one or two others can't seem to get your head round, is why, having gone to all the trouble of setting up the deal with ETV and initially promoting the launch, they suddenly dropped all promotion before the launch, and before they knew it was going to be a failure.