Siri - Chat and Discussion

(12-02-2014 13:34 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  think the image quality was as it was because it was probably done through a webcam. hopefully s66 will learn their lessons from last night and make any future shows from LA much better

NO thanks



Which is the point of these shows?

* Watch a pornstar on Tv on her webcam?
* Speak with a pornstar?


There are many porn star in MFC where they are naked and aren't motionless on a bed, Sophia is a good example and you can interact with her free

(12-02-2014 12:34 )TickleTheOrc Wrote:  Starting to think everyone's expectations were set a little high based on the promotion of this event.

Just so people are clear, it is the first time S66 has attempted broadcast a webcam stream from LA to their studios with Siri. Which they haven't done a webcam show with Siri before. Technical issues with girls using what S66 provides to webcam with is fairly high when they first use it.

The expectation that it should work or they had tested it out is slightly out of focus. As a regular to the webcam shows, most first shows are... problem-filled which is the norm. Things generally smooth out after a couple of shows.

As for the complaint on the quality of the feed, it is somewhat valid. Assuming the quality of the stream is dependent on the webcam or some HD setting. I will say though that the quality is decent and clear enough that the broadcast is passable.

I think most guys haven't sat through webcam sessions where the quality is so poor, that the webcam looks like it came from the 90's.

Only one organization to blame for any such over-high expectations and that's Studio66 themselves for the degree to which they built up last night's show in advance.

Around 12 hours after Siri's show ended, their twitter account has still made no effort to apologise for the late start of that show (cutting its length by more than half) or that embarrassing 11.15pm tweet last night reminding us about a show being underway when actually it hadn't yet done so (and wouldn't do so for another further 50 minutes).

Any attempt to excuse last night's problems as typical first-attempt webcam gremlins (which viewers aren't understanding enough because they don't watch webcams) totally misses the point because Studio 66 chose to broadcast this first-attempt show on a digital-tv channel (rather than just as a webcam show) and therefore should be expected to be judged in relation to the normal technical standards viewers see on any of their digital-tv channels.

Guess what, a lot of people don't watch webcam sessions for the exact reason that they've tried them but repeatedly regard such output as sub-standard to any level they find they enjoy.

If so many first-attempt webcam shows are glitch-strewn, why didn't Studio 66 settle for trying a first "Siri, live from LA" show just on webcam rather than going straight to digital-tv with it and crossing their fingers none of those glitches happen ?

Any credible business would be raising the technical standards of its webcam output so that it's good enough to go on digital-tv - not lowering the technical standards of its digital-tv output as a lame way of excusing any lacklustre webcam quality.

Several sports channels show live action from the USA every night (horse racing, basketball, ice hockey or baseball depending on the time of year) with no reason for any of their viewers to feel there's anything remarkably ground-breaking about being able to watch something from several thousand miles away so, again, it's no credible excuse for anyone to bleat that Studio 66 deserve leeway for it being their first time trying to show something live from LA.

(12-02-2014 13:10 )mr mystery Wrote:  Siri was laid down at the bottom of the TV screen virtually totally covered in bloody great big OSG's, obviously there was no camera operator to adjust the camera so that Siri wasn't covered in TV broadcast OSG's, so i didn't watch for long.

Actually, for at least 10 minutes last night once Siri had gone topless, by far the best way to watch her (although in just a corner of a bigger screen) was on Hannah's channel where Studio 66 advertised Siri's show with a small OSG-free box showing her live pictures.

Don't know if that fitted any normal definition of a 2-4-1 but it was certainly an unexpected highlight after the earlier delay.

(12-02-2014 14:04 )quiquems Wrote:  NO thanks

Which is the point of these shows?

* Watch a pornstar on Tv on her webcam?
* Speak with a pornstar?

There are many porn star in MFC where they are naked and aren't motionless on a bed, Sophia is a good example and you can interact with her free

Not sure if you've ever noticed, the pornstars on MFC are usually the exception.

The watch/speak to a pornstar via webcam is a trending feature now on a lot of pornstar websites I know of. Usually, a paid feature.

And bringing up MFC is like comparing apples to avocados. MFC is a large highly competitive webcamming website and S66 is a tv broadcast/babe website, both which aims are completely different.

Since S66 can't have all their girls naked, nor do it for free/customer tips, its not really a comparison. While some S66 girls have cammed on MFC, few have stayed long term on it.

(12-02-2014 14:23 )whangie Wrote:  Only one organization to blame for any such over-high expectations and that's Studio66 themselves for the degree to which they built up last night's show in advance.

Yes, S66 should have started with babysteps and at least had Siri do a webcam session first to iron out the problems. As with most businesses, the hype machine/advertising kinda of oversold us a bit. I'm not sure S66 understands how effective social media/twitter is in this current day and age.

(12-02-2014 14:23 )whangie Wrote:  Around 12 hours after Siri's show ended, their twitter account has still made no effort to apologise for the late start of that show (cutting its length by more than half) or that embarrassing 11.15pm tweet last night reminding us about a show being underway when actually it hadn't yet done so (and wouldn't do so for another further 50 minutes).

As anyone that actually looks at their twitter can tell, S66's twitter is sorta automated. Those tweets are pretty much all pre-written in advance. Pretty much, S66 is primarily using twitter as a advertising tool. Nothing more to them. For the rest of us, twitter is also a up-to-the-minute live update tool.

(12-02-2014 14:23 )whangie Wrote:  Any attempt to excuse last night's problems as typical first-attempt webcam gremlins (which viewers aren't understanding enough because they don't watch webcams) totally misses the point because Studio 66 chose to broadcast this first-attempt show on a digital-tv channel (rather than just as a webcam show) and therefore should be expected to be judged in relation to the normal technical standards viewers see on any of their digital-tv channels.

Yea, S66 fudge up there. I'm not sure how any person that webcams can possibly meet up to the expectations of a tv viewer. Why?

1. Most people webcam alone, so you can't expect a cameraman to move the webcam around without the model doing it.
2. Most people that webcam, use a freaking webcam. Unless the model is using the best ones out there, the quality is not going to hold a candle to a camera made to broadcast video for television.

(12-02-2014 14:23 )whangie Wrote:  Guess what, a lot of people don't watch webcam sessions for the exact reason that they've tried them but repeatedly regard such output as sub-standard to any level they find they enjoy.

If so many first-attempt webcam shows are glitch-strewn, why didn't Studio 66 settle for trying a first "Siri, live from LA" show just on webcam rather than going straight to digital-tv with it and crossing their fingers none of those glitches happen ?

I'm not sure S66 has grasped the concept of why pornstar webcams are popular. The restrictions put on them as tv broadcasters shackles what people going into webcam session expect. Which is more then what you normally see on broadcast tv.

S66 probably assumed that because Siri already webcams on her own site via another company i mentioned a couple of pages back, that they wouldn't have any noticeable hiccups. However, whenever someone decides to assume, they tend to make an "ass" out "you" and "me". Given the track record for first time cams with S66, I was surprised when they announced their live from LA show with such short notice.

(12-02-2014 14:23 )whangie Wrote:  Any credible business would be raising the technical standards of its webcam output so that it's good enough to go on digital-tv - not lowering the technical standards of its digital-tv output as a lame way of excusing any lacklustre webcam quality.

Several sports channels show live action from the USA every night (horse racing, basketball, ice hockey or baseball depending on the time of year) with no reason for any of their viewers to feel there's anything remarkably ground-breaking about being able to watch something from several thousand miles away so, again, it's no credible excuse for anyone to bleat that Studio 66 deserve leeway for it being their first time trying to show something live from LA.

S66 does not really have an iron grip on how a model webcams, nor do they attempt to set a standard to be followed. If they did, the quality of the webcams would be better, but fewer models would probably attempt to do it.

Based on the problems seen, S66 is probably run by a much smaller crew then you would think. Which is probably why these issues crop up in the first place. While there is money to be made as a tv broadcaster, I doubt it compares to the chunk of change that sports tv broadcasting brings in.

While not groundbreaking for the world as you would put it, it is groundbreaking for S66. Which is two completely different standards.
Could they have done it/planned it out better? Yeah. Are they the type to lay out plans? Nope, they like many smaller businesses, fly by the seat of their pants. They risk more for reward. When they fudge up though, they also do it on a more epic scale.

So basically, all they did was to simply tap into Siri's webcam and broadcast it on TV as a late, watered down cam show, and then still managed to fuck that up?
Is that what we're saying?
Amazing

not a big fan of siri's couch.

Will everyone stop hating you get to to see one of the hottest pornstars free whats wrong with that?!

Dont think its hating, but you expect a better picture.

(15-02-2014 11:42 )BLACK Wrote:  Will everyone stop hating you get to to see one of the hottest pornstars free whats wrong with that?!

Yes, and if you click onto any porn website you can find these hot porn stars actually performing real porn
This is also free with decent image quality chucked in for good measure
So why should we feel like this is amazing and special
It isn't.
But paying Sarah Matty to get her huge rack out would be

I think if they want Siri on more, the control room could maybe go two hours without the text adverts on the one channel. Seems pointless having Siri set up a show and then block her with ads. All they need is the phone number and maybe replace the spinning S66 logo with #S66inLA. Then when she's gone stick all the graphics back on when there's a moving camera to compensate.