Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

Preeti is doing a "2 minute challenge listen in line", how do they know whether Preeti or the caller has won if she can't hear the callers.
Anyway the score has just jumped from 14-0 to 17-0 to 25-9 in a few seconds, what a load of baloney.

Nine callers going the distance would take eighteen minutes You don't need the maths skills of the lovely Rachel Riley to work out these scores are a little dubious.

55-12 now, come on Preeti , can she be the first girl to make it to the incredible score of 100?


edit: only made it to 71, nothing less than that next time will be acceptable!

(04-12-2016 23:54 )Camillas No.1 Fan Wrote:  Hello all forum members. I have an announcement to make, I will be running the Queen of Babestation 2016. It will start this Wednesday 7th December. More details are to follow then.

I expect that BS management will hope that Fanny Perv Cam is the
Winner for 2016 for being their " Cash Cow" so perhaps the prize
should go to a champion Jersey heifer
As we can see only the top third of the babes bodies I will not be voting
Sorry for being so negative but after watching the shows for over 10 years 2016 has been the worst ever

(05-12-2016 00:18 )Tractor boy Wrote:  Nine callers going the distance would take eighteen minutes You don't need the maths skills of the lovely Rachel Riley to work out these scores are a little dubious.

Possibly half those call are probably fakce calls from backroom staff I wonder?

(05-12-2016 02:33 )TURNIPHEAD Wrote:  

(04-12-2016 23:54 )Camillas No.1 Fan Wrote:  Hello all forum members. I have an announcement to make, I will be running the Queen of Babestation 2016. It will start this Wednesday 7th December. More details are to follow then.

I expect that BS management will hope that Fanny Perv Cam is the
Winner for 2016 for being their " Cash Cow" so perhaps the prize
should go to a champion Jersey heifer

SNIP

...2016 has been the worst ever

Indeed - the deterioration in 2016 (and more specifically, since pervcam was introduced) has been more dramatic than the downward spiral of 2013 - 2015 combined!

On the internet feed:

Why can't they move the huge, deep phone number OSG from the bottom middle of the screen to top left or top right where it wouldn't interfere with the critical part to view? Is it deliberately put in such a bad place?

(05-12-2016 16:00 )Rake Wrote:  On the internet feed:

Why can't they move the huge, deep phone number OSG from the bottom middle of the screen to top left or top right where it wouldn't interfere with the critical part to view? Is it deliberately put in such a bad place?

Whaaaaaaaaaaat? .
That's an outrageously sensible suggestion that might be popular with viewers.
Go and stand in the corner and give yourself a talking to .
We can't have initiatives that give the punters what they want, I mean it it it it it's the thin end of the wedge, end of civilisation as we know it.
Barbarism .
Quite frankly I'm appalled. I'm off to write a letter to OFCOM right away .

(05-12-2016 21:23 )snookered147 Wrote:  

(05-12-2016 16:00 )Rake Wrote:  On the internet feed:

Why can't they move the huge, deep phone number OSG from the bottom middle of the screen to top left or top right where it wouldn't interfere with the critical part to view? Is it deliberately put in such a bad place?

I'm off to write a letter to OFCOM right away .

Why on a website with all the information around the screen picture do they need any OSG's on the Screen, just a duplication of information, they should look at their competition sites that keep the screen clear of information that obscures the picture!

Also love to hear OFCOM's reply as its a Web issue and not a TV issue!

just wondering if its often babestation check out whats happening on studio66 ,if they did they might get a few ideas on HOW to film a girl fully naked whilst perv cam is on so that sky viewers alike can enjoy the shows,instead of having to see the girls belly button upwards for most of the night ,