Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

(28-08-2016 06:21 )trains55 Wrote:  

(28-08-2016 00:46 )jimmyt73 Wrote:  

(28-08-2016 00:34 )Censorship :-( Wrote:  

(28-08-2016 00:22 )jimmyt73 Wrote:  

(28-08-2016 00:08 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  now it's triple babe time on 909!!!!! 5 babes for 3 channels is too many

Quite agree,during the Dutch regulated period there were many occasions when having five or more babes would have been ideal,but under current OFCOM regs all it seems to do is censor how far one babe can due to another,or tonight 2 others being present,in summary two or more babes who can interact was a good idea but putting three together under current restrictions is madness,particularly when two of them have put stronger solo stints on for some time.

I would be very surprised if the extreme tameness, and the other shit that's wrong with the channels these days, is anything to do with 'Ofcon'.

Correct me if im wrong but although OFCOM may not be fully responsible,it was them who banned 241s with actual contact in 2012,so this was why i expressed my opinion on the need for more than four babes a night under current restrictions,some by the regulator and equally bs must share the blame as well.

BUT recently especially last night there has been bodily contact occasionally BUT not overtly sexually! SO is it bS and not OFCON! It looks that way to me! WHY?

It's because they make the FTA 'shows' as tame as possible, in an attempt to encourage as many people as possible to go for the 'paid upfront' content (BS Xtra, pervcam etc.) to get the 'good stuff', while using 'Ofcon' as a convenient scapegoat.

At least, that's my guess.

What a steaming pile of shite this weekend has been on Tamestation!

I feared that 2016 would be a new low for the babe channels, but little did I know just how bad things would become, thanks to producer enforced tameness, DBS/TBS and pervcam.

Fucking abysmal!

time they called it a day and started from the top with proper organisation

the problem is that its always been part of a larger organisation rather than a seperate entity like S66 and RLC was

so it has outside interference. babestation itself has always been a good little money earner for Cellcast with other parts of the company not doing so good

(29-08-2016 06:58 )HannahsPet Wrote:  so it has outside interference. babestation itself has always been a good little money earner for Cellcast with other parts of the company not doing so good

Are you sure? I thought it was other activities that were propping up the Babestation side of things?
Not sure how that has any bearing on producing shit shows though?
I wouldn't know myself, I don't bother with Babestation as it tends to cater for a different audience

(28-08-2016 15:36 )SecretAgent Wrote:  Heard a bit more today from Danni Levy about the new shift pattern she'd told me about. Seems that the idea is for a girl to do 6pm to 1am. First 3 hours will be on the dayshow then they'll do 4 hours on the nightshow.

Hmm means an additional 4 hours of the night show with Danni - I like it

4 hours of Hannah C, Morgan Preece, Gemma Jane, Tanya & Vicki Narni on nights would be pretty good as well.

i doubt hannah would do any later than 9pm but i love bein proved wrong

More chance of any of us winning the lottery then Hannah Claydon doing nights

most likely I think of the babes that tractor has mentioned he'd like to do the 6pm-1am shift is Morgan Preece

^^^ Well I'd guess that at best you might get 1 out of 5 as the others won't do nights.