Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

They don't seem to be caring so much what the Horror channel on Sky is showing, there's been plenty of growler over there not so long since

Well exactly and only just last week they aired the formerly banned sexplotation movie Bare Behind Bars which is another channel which SKY takes no responsibility for either.

(15-04-2015 23:14 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  Bare Behind Bars

That's the one I couldn't remember the name.

I bought the DVD off amazon when it was banned in the UK So that kind of blows the SKY must have ordered BS1 to tame it theory up in smoke

I apologise guys for my post I feel a right tit!!

This does seem to be a peculiar turn of events, if, as seems to be the case, there is sometimes different, and apparently 'better' output on FV compared to $ky.

FV has always been the poor relation to $ky in terms of babe channels:-

They appeared on $ky long before FV, and when they finally arrived on FV, in the form of specially for FV shows, they were VERY tame (though, ironically, these early efforts were vastly more entertaining than anything around today, IMO).

Then there is the limited bandwidth on the platform, and associated costs of FV, which means that Tamestation has largely had it all their own way, so little incentive to 'up their game', plus less hours broadcast than on $ky, not to mention the waste of bandwidth known as BSX that FV has been subjected to (which also reduces the already limited airtime of BS1 yet further). Oh, almost forgot the 'no tits out before 22.30' rule that, until quite recently, TS had adhered to... I could go on!

So why is FV getting 'better' output, relatively speaking? This would suggest some $ky 'involvement', but then why is the webstream also affected? Why doesn't it just carry the FV output? And, as others have pointed out, $ky has been keen to say that the content of any channel is nothing to do with them, so why risk this 'get out', which would make them open to being 'held responsible' for any/all channels on their platform, that some moral minority busy body complained about?

Very strange.

So if that is the case and it is indeed SKY that is to blame for the output on BS1 then why would they air Spencer Tunnick on SKY ARTS and 18+ movies such as the sessions at any time of the day, would seem rather odd why they'd be giving 2 fucks about some late night soft porn channel. Once again I'll say its ofcom related or the producers themselves just acting the cunt for the hell of it.

(15-04-2015 23:40 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  So if that is the case and it is indeed SKY that is to blame for the output on BS1 then why would they air Spencer Tunnick on SKY ARTS and 18+ movies such as the sessions at any time of the day, would seem rather odd why they'd be giving 2 fucks about some late night soft porn channel. Once again I'll say its ofcom related or the producers themselves just acting the cunt for the hell of it.

Beats me mate

(15-04-2015 23:40 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  So if that is the case and it is indeed SKY that is to blame for the output on BS1 then why would they air Spencer Tunnick on SKY ARTS and 18+ movies such as the sessions at any time of the day, would seem rather odd why they'd be giving 2 fucks about some late night soft porn channel. Once again I'll say its ofcom related or the producers themselves just acting the cunt for the hell of it.

Not sure if that was addressed to me ( I rather argued against $ky being to blame, despite it being the initially obvious explanation), but, why would 'Ofcon' want tamer output on $ky? In the past, they have been even more heavy handed with FV!

Whichever way you slice it ($ky, 'Ofcon', producers...), it doesn’t seem to make much sense.

Of course, this whole issue is in addition to how crap ALL channels are, and have been for some time.

Unless it s OFCOM trying to implement the anti porn legislation in such a way to keep NO.10 happy BUT THEY 'RE BEING MORE HEAVY HANDED than no.10 had anticipated!!