Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

^Well as it seems that Labour are pretty much a shoe to achieve power in six months, then let's see if that changes anything as well.

(13-11-2014 13:41 )lacey_fan Wrote:  Rammy you may as well change allegiances to Babestation, most of the top babes that were on S66 are now on BS. Now all BS need to do is lure Clare Richards and Delia Rose away from S66

I'm starting to wonder if this is S66's grand plan to get on freeview. When there are enough undercover S66 babes on Bs, they're going to overpower the producers, take down the Bs OSG's, and replace them with S66

(14-11-2014 22:01 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  Yes and no, but if such a transfer were made I'd imagine it wouldn't exactly be cheap to do. I think to be honest Babestation and the rest of the channels are currently holding their breath to see whoever replaces Ed Richards as the new Chief Executive of Ofcom isn't as big a cunt as he was to the channels before thinking of the potential loopholes such as more oversea's licences.

We so need Cwpussylover to replace OFCOM.

^Maybe cwpussylover will try and pass himself off as the new incoming head of Ofcom, but they might get a bit suspicious though when he keeps wanting to see the meaty cunt flaps of the female board members.

In the same way S66 are overusing their most boring sets I have noticed BS are going the same way.
Over reliance on the platform sets, office set and boudoir.
Bring back the massage table, alleyway, sauna and paddling pool asap.
And introduce a bath tub or shower set urgently.

Is it me or are the osg's getting BIGGER....BS1 Should be focusing on the girls NOT the advertising....a third of the screen is taken up at the bottom and a quarter from the side....and they just about manage to squeeze the two girls into whats left......

^ They have to keep increasing the size because their regular audience consists of frequent wankers and it's a well known fact it makes you go blind

(16-11-2014 09:47 )davetherave57 Wrote:  Is it me or are the osg's getting BIGGER....BS1 Should be focusing on the girls NOT the advertising....a third of the screen is taken up at the bottom and a quarter from the side....and they just about manage to squeeze the two girls into whats left......

Totally agree. We can easily read the numbers if it was a 1/4 of the size font. The channels seem hell-bent on ruining a product that Offcom has already emasculated beyond all reason.

(16-11-2014 01:22 )snookered147 Wrote:  In the same way S66 are overusing their most boring sets I have noticed BS are going the same way.
Over reliance on the platform sets, office set and boudoir.
Bring back the massage table, alleyway, sauna and paddling pool asap.
And introduce a bath tub or shower set urgently.

Could not agree more,the platform sets are used too often,and dont look comfortable as most babes now have extra cushions,also agree that a water based set or at the very least the massage table is desperately needed.

(14-11-2014 20:52 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  To answer your question gunnar it's because Cellcast is based in the Neitherlands.

This is untrue. Cellcast is a UK company and it is NOT based in the Netherlands.

The correct answer to gunnar's question is that ALL Babestation licences are issued in the Netherlands, both Sky and Freeview. This does not include Sky channels 908 and 909 because there are no Babestation licences for those channels. The licence holder for those channels is a third party.