Non callers entitled to criticize

(09-06-2013 04:33 )admiral decker Wrote:  

(09-06-2013 02:24 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  our SKY subscription also funds the channels too.

You're kidding right? You think Sky generously give part of our subscriptions to the babe channels?

No, but to watch many of these channels you have to have a Sky Box or internet connection. So anyone who's watching these channels has sort of paid for their viewership by default.

(09-06-2013 10:24 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  non callers can criticise the shows, but they do need to appreciate the shows are mainly about phone sex and not about what they watch on screen as long as a babe is bringing in the calls it doesn't matter whether people here like her or don't like her

the babeshows make money from people calling the shows and downloading pics and vids, not from how many people watch the shows or money from sky tv

Well if that's the case then why bother showing the girls on screen? The more viewers the more likely to be a higher number callers. What attracted the callers in the first place is the fact they can view, if it's just for the phone sex, well there's many places that can provide that and have done before these channels were available.

(09-06-2013 18:43 )seth Wrote:  

(09-06-2013 04:33 )admiral decker Wrote:  

(09-06-2013 02:24 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  our SKY subscription also funds the channels too.

You're kidding right? You think Sky generously give part of our subscriptions to the babe channels?

No, but to watch many of these channels you have to have a Sky Box or internet connection. So anyone who's watching these channels has sort of paid for their viewership by default.

The phone in channels are all Free To Air. All you need is a box and a dish which you can purchase used or from any independent satellite dealer. No need to pay Sky a penny if you don't want to.

The channels all pay to be on the Sky EPG and that money comes from the callers.

Whether I like what a particularly performer is doing on screen is deciding factor on whether I call show or not. I do understand point you make though Rammy about the channels not caring about performance on screen if the babe is bringing in calls.

(09-06-2013 10:24 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  non callers can criticise the shows, but they do need to appreciate the shows are mainly about phone sex and not about what they watch on screen as long as a babe is bringing in the calls it doesn't matter whether people here like her or don't like her

the babeshows make money from people calling the shows and downloading pics and vids, not from how many people watch the shows or money from sky tv

(09-06-2013 11:12 )marco01 Wrote:  You make a very good point there rammy, but dont forget the people who watch on sky could become potential customers, so even if they havent rung before, what they see could infleunce them in calling for the first time, so all in all i agree everybody, has a write to criticise the show wether you phone or not, i mean if your a football fan, just cause you dont go to the games doesnt mean you cant criticise the team you
support, if you are not happy with the way they are playing does it.

of course there is a visual element marco to the shows I know that. just saying that the shows are phone sex channels and the main thing is how a babe is on the phones

(09-06-2013 04:52 )BarrieBF Wrote:  

(09-06-2013 02:24 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  Also its worth remembering that viewing figures also boosts the channels revenue

But there aren't any viewing figures for the babe channels, because they don't bother to participate in the BARB audience rating system.

But if they did participate, how would the viewing figures boost the channels revenue?

It's called FREEDOM OF SPEECH so quit the bullshit with non callers can't criticize !!! And judging by how shit the channels are nowadays criticize as much as you like

Back in the day when the shows were so much better and before ofcom came in and fucked them all up phoning them and getting through was an achievement, I know this because I spent many a night waiting in a long cue waiting to get through.

It had a sort of lure about it all, knowing that the models would do virtually anything you wanted to see.

Babestar TV and Sexstation TV (circa 2006) spring to mind here

So yes I completely agree with the fact that non callers have got a right to complain.

At the end of the day - Put on a good show and we will call - Put on a bad show like tonight then we will not call - Some might but not all.

Time to give the majority of the punters what we really want to see by way of telling ofcom to get to fuck

(10-06-2013 04:19 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  .........
At the end of the day - Put on a good show and we will call - Put on a bad show like tonight then we will not call - Some might but not all.
.........

SB - Nail, hit, head. That should be the mottif for the forum.

We could get Kevin Costner to do it as per Field of Dreams "Put on a good show and they will come" with a good bit of uplighting, a gentle breeze, and an annoying techno soundtrack that your hoping you don't hum at work in case anyone recognises it

Sorry for the obscure film reference

I'm a non caller. So what?
I feel entitled to criticize the show or the girls ev'rytime I have a reason for that or I want to.
It's called freedom of speech.

I have my opinions and I'll be glad to share them with you, no matter if you are callers or not.

Some shows don't deserve a single call, in my opinion... but people call anyway.

It's called freedom of call.