BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion

looking at these caps which i have never seen before i definitely can conclude that Dionne Mendez takes it up the shit pipe. thoughts?

Kartel was on last night and was very good. The standard of shows seems to be high at the moment.

yep,agree premacyblue that kartel was very good and that the standard of the live shows is taking a definite turn for the better.they really need to get rid of the mass of tame regurgitated stuff that they keep repeating between the live shows.there shouldnt be any problem in replacing it with something stronger and more interesting.they could do this and stay within permissable limits.lets hope they keep moving towards a truly x encrypted channel as much as is permitted,and that all the material shown is clearly distinctive from the tame content that is readily available on the free to air channels.

i enjoyed another strong live show last night,this time from the sexy lou lou petite.as live girls have recently shown, open pussy is clearly permissible and within the guidelines.no reason why this cant be the norm on this encrypted x channel.girls not prepared to conform to these allowable x standards should really stay on the free to air channels.am looking forward to seeing which girls are going to be on in the coming shows.heres hoping they keep up the standards of recent shows and continue to spread those pussies wide.

(05-03-2013 16:30 )sierraman Wrote:  yep,agree premacyblue that kartel was very good and that the standard of the live shows is taking a definite turn for the better.

I almost made a post yesterday saying that although the standard of the live shows has taken a definite turn for the better, there was still a problem in that the same few girls are being recycled a bit too often. But then I notice that there was someone new on last night, so perhaps things are improving in that regard too.

(05-03-2013 00:38 )Grawth Wrote:  My belief (unsubstantiated) is that the slips are OK because they are slips, and more importantly, they are ENCRYPTED slips. BSX should receive the same treatment from Ofcom. And if they didnt then they could simply point to the other encrypted channels and ask Ofcom why they havent done anything about THEIR slips.

Slips (I think) are only a problem on FTA.

My guess is that "slips" are tolerated provided they are brief and not massively explicit. "Slips" are tolerated in BBFC rated 18 films on the same basis. If they are long enough to get percy out and get erect they are almost always edited out, but a brief 1 second flash enough to show what is going on is accepted. Flashes become less and less acceptable if they are in close up, the harder the scene or the less mainstream the action, so a brief flash of open pussy, erect cock, oral or even vaginal penetration might be OK, but forget about ejaculation (from the penis), anal, group or flashes in a BDSM context.

The other factor is that live shows are classified as advertising, recorded ones are not, and there are different rules.

(07-03-2013 00:10 )eccles Wrote:  

(05-03-2013 00:38 )Grawth Wrote:  My belief (unsubstantiated) is that the slips are OK because they are slips, and more importantly, they are ENCRYPTED slips. BSX should receive the same treatment from Ofcom. And if they didnt then they could simply point to the other encrypted channels and ask Ofcom why they havent done anything about THEIR slips.

Slips (I think) are only a problem on FTA.

My guess is that "slips" are tolerated provided they are brief and not massively explicit. "Slips" are tolerated in BBFC rated 18 films on the same basis. If they are long enough to get percy out and get erect they are almost always edited out, but a brief 1 second flash enough to show what is going on is accepted. Flashes become less and less acceptable if they are in close up, the harder the scene or the less mainstream the action, so a brief flash of open pussy, erect cock, oral or even vaginal penetration might be OK, but forget about ejaculation (from the penis), anal, group or flashes in a BDSM context.

The other factor is that live shows are classified as advertising, recorded ones are not, and there are different rules.

The live BSX shows are not classed as advertising, for a start BSX doesn't come under Ofcom advertising rules and Ofcom doesn't regulate BSX, the BSX channel is Dutch owned and licensed in Holland and regulated by Nicam not Ofcom, BSX is a pay per view encrypted channel, so what you get to see on BSX is not a advertisement whether live or not because it is the product you have already purchased .

It seems as though BS have finally abandoned the idea of trying to get the "regular" girls to do more daring stuff, as was the original idea behind the channel, and are now importing "porn stars" and other girls who are mostly prepared to do full frontal. The regular girls' appearances seem to be confined to the recorded (and much repeated) segments which generally wouldn't offend a meeting of the Mothers' Union (actually I've heard these latter can get pretty raunchy ).
Not saying this is necessarily a bad thing but presumably they haven't been getting the audiences they would like with the original concept (no doubt some "expert" will tell me they're still making a shed load though).

Mr Mystery wrote.....

The live BSX shows are not classed as advertising, for a start BSX doesn't come under Ofcom advertising rules and Ofcom doesn't regulate BSX, the BSX channel is Dutch owned and licensed in Holland and regulated by Nicam not Ofcom, BSX is a pay per view encrypted channel, so what you get to see on BSX is not a advertisement whether live or not because it is the product you have already purchased .

Mate,have you watched bsX,..the live shows have advertisements in a big bright blue box taking up imho a fifth of the screen.
They are constantly rolling advertisements to try to get you to visit Sexstation or phone filthy sluts etc. etc.
On top of that they have a small grey rolling bar at the bottom of the screen advertising exactly the same thing (which in my opinion is all they need).
Pay per view,or Pay for adverts?

(07-03-2013 02:33 )gtheboy Wrote:  Mate,have you watched bsX,..the live shows have advertisements in a big bright blue box taking up imho a fifth of the screen.
They are constantly rolling advertisements to try to get you to visit Sexstation or phone filthy sluts etc. etc.
On top of that they have a small grey rolling bar at the bottom of the screen advertising exactly the same thing (which in my opinion is all they need).
Pay per view,or Pay for adverts?

Yes i know they show adverts, but the point i was making was that BSX is the product that you get when you have paid for the channel after seeing the adverts on the un-encrypted channel, on top of that BSX isn't regulated in accordance with Ofcom's advertising code classification guidelines in any case. I think what eccles was bearing in mind is that in 2010 Ofcom reclassified the babe channels as teleshopping, they then came under the advertising code rules and they had less leeway than editorial programs because they now come under the advertising code rules/guidelines, before 2010 they weren't classed as Teleshopping programs and weren't classed as advertising even though they showed adverts for various services. In September 2010 Ofcom banned all babe channels from broadcasting on freeview before 12am as this new babe channel advertising code for freeview doesn't allow adult babe channels to be shown before 12am .
NICAM the Dutch regulator didn't take this view, they regulate totally differently to Ofcom, NICAM saw nothing wrong with the babe channels whether that be encrypted or un-encrypted from starting before 12am
. NICAM the regulator of BSX stands for "Netherlands Institute for the Classification of Audio-visual Media" they regulate on the basis of what age limit and content classification they give a tv program, they do this in the same way as films/DVD etc are given classifications, BSX is regulated on the basis that it classed as having a Dutch 16 plus minimum age rating and shows the Dutch symbols for containing sex, it doesn't matter to NICAM if the shows are live or recorded or have phone line numbers on screen etc, they regulate purely on the age and content classification that the program operates under, ie 16+ sexual content, BSX may show adverts but Nicam doesn't regulate them on the basis of BSX being a advert/Teleshopping program in the same way as Ofcom would when regulating the live shows .

I think eccles was forgetting that Ofcom doesn't regulate BSX so doesn't come under Ofcom teleshopping licence conditions when he made his post mentioning that the shows are classed as advertisements and have different rules etc for the live shows.

BSX operates under NICAM Regulations and not Ofcom teleshoppng licence conditions/rules. NICAM regulate in accordance with Dutch and European Laws, they take into account UK laws when regulating programs that broadcast on UK TV, but they are not compelled to regulate to Ofcom guidelines etc, Ofcom do not make UK or European tv laws, they have no power to do so, Ofcom make rules and guidelines etc for the channels they regulate and licence, they have no power to ban or block channels Like BS/BSX from broadcasting on UK TV using a fellow European Country's licence and being regulated by that country's regulator, we are all Europeans these days .

Here is a link to NICAM and how they do things http://www.kijkwijzer.nl/index.php?id=36