Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)

I will give them the next 2 days. If they disappoint with this epic line-up then I think they killed the show for good and the soft show is their new baseline to promote the Pervcam.
If this will happen I might stop watching until they change this again. I have better things to do with my time.

Lejla was spectecular in the past, my favorite girl. Always does hot shows. Heisse Lola is a beautiful girl and she did also many many hot shows. July Johnson is difficult to predict, the special guests were never that good, but based on what she does ( which is porn) she too would be able to show a lot.

I think Lejla will do the Perv. Which is the first negative thing because the last time it seemed that she was a bit uncomfortable with that, always afraid to show too much she looked to the cameraman with a question mark on her face.

So for me personally this is the end game for BS24 tonight.

Yes Lejla was naked. Like i said: She never disappoints. But for me as long as the show is focussed on the Pervcam I don' t think this is a good show.
I said it before: I don't like simulated porn ( like handpussy etc. ). .

For me the age of Babeshows on TV is over. I won't waste anymore time on BS24 and similiar channels.

That doesn't mean that nobody can enjoy the show but for my personal needs ( aesthetic hot erotic) this is nothing.

So. I won't write here any longer. Suffice it to say that i had good conversations here. Good Bye.

See you next week then

I wrote a while back that if Germany, like Italy, had it's way then this would no longer be on tv. Possible that Germany can not do much about BS24 if what Mauro wrote may years ago is true and BS24 actually has a Dutch broadcasting licence just like the UK version. The Dutch are more likely to present two fingers to any interference from their big brother whereas the Austrians, where ETV was licensed, bowed to the EU directives probably at the bequest of Germany.

Even so I do believe that the days of this form of 'entertainment' on tv are numbered. To survive all such services are evolving and not for the better. The sad thing is that most viewers now prefer these cams, blurry shows where you can see more, and the ilk rather than pick up the dog and bone and try to hold a conversation.

These platforms will eventually moved to web only. Yet even that is unlikely to afford them the freedom they anticipate since regulation is catching up there.

I think they should separate pc streaming from the TV show. keep 2 girls on TV for users who want a light seduction / provocation show and have a hardcore girl on the show in streaming with a peepshow entry ticket for users who just want to see the girl completely naked. this solution i seems the only one to satisfy all users.
in the current situation those who want hardcore continue to complain and write in the chat take off your panties / open legs, those who want a light show complains because the girls are forced to remain almost still for several minutes to not show her pussy in free.

oops watch 29th sep here: https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid2207777

Jolina just announced that 'by popular demand' she will run the cam for 'just' one hour from 11 pm (CET)/10 pm (UK)

Better that nothing I guess.

I am probably talking to myself but I do a lot of that anyway

As promised, Jolina did her 'hour'. Same setup as the one a week ago but not as revealing since the free camera was close enough. The view behind the blur was nice tho . But anyone just watching the 'free' view could be scratching their head as to what happened to Jolina. Suddenly she had put on the kilos and was much plumper than before. Simply because the camera or the window has the wrong aspect ratio and they never even attempted to fix it.

Now even with my limited grasp of the German language she said, and repeated it several times, she would only do one hour. Yet after a short break she was on the bed - when she put those glasses on I almost came over my keyboard - and she did another shorter cam session. But now we were in classic 'peepshow' territory and this was IMO top of the scale and possibly the most revealing in 'free' view on a bed that she has ever been.

In the second half I noted she got naked just the once. No cam was present now. But there was also a nice aerial view towards the end. Show ended one hour early.

All in all, for me, a nice show. And pls wear those glasses again

It's true yesterday it was a good show. sure it was not like the show camangel-nicky but we have to be happy for a while with bs24.
i hope they will be so also in the next days.

I will not comment on each and every show. Just ones that tick certain boxes.

Now if a girl removes her panties 10 mins in to a show there may be disappointment ahead as in the case of Angi Kroxx last week. But last night Wild Vicky delivered.

There has been another development. Last night one did not see just one pervcam but the minute Sidney Pearl arrived there were two cams. Actually IMO Sidney's performance was actually better that Vicky's.

Vicky spent a lot of time in 'the office' trying to tempt users in to her cam on the premise she would use her toy where the sun does not shine. Other than private shows which they did appear to be running last night she required atleast 5 in a group show for that to happen. I was not tempted. Yet it still occurred to me that what they were doing, with that toy quite visible in the 'free' view when she was applying oral to it, was one 'legal' step too far.

I am no prude but I preferred Sidney, who was fully naked for several segments, to the more blatant approach from Vicky.

Only time will tell if this is repeated.

OK DB83 you were right. I am still here

But I have a new approach to the show: If it is obvious that they do a soft show I instantly turn it off. If they overdo the blurry cam I turn it off. So no watching for several hours and hoping for the best.

Yesterday they clearly tried something new so I watched the show for quite some time. Since I dislike the Pervcam for obvious and multiply stated reasons I was shocked that they have two now...

Yes they were both completely naked for quite some time and they had nice camera angles. That wasn´t that bad. The show itself - what the girls did - was at some times quite good.

But with some good ideas - as always with this channel - there has to be a downside for the TV viewer: They have a Cam-to-Cam Function now. So you can show yourself to the girl. If this is activated they take the picture of that girl from the TV.

So they have now the Pervcam and the REAL Pervcam, where they use Dildos etc..

Yesterday - a monday - it wasn´t that busy but that can lead to several minutes without any picture on the TV screen. If both girls are occupied with Cam-to-Cam or just one girl is on.

Yesterday both pictures constantly faded out and in, because Cam-to-Cam was activated but shortly after deactivated again.

Another turn-off for me.

(03-10-2018 09:55 )DB83 Wrote:  Yet it still occurred to me that what they were doing, with that toy quite visible in the 'free' view when she was applying oral to it, was one 'legal' step too far.

Like I said before. If you own a TV Channel in Germany you have to charge an employer of your team to be a "Jugendschutzbeauftragter", that means (roughly) Juvenile Protection Appointee. If you don´t do that you can´t open the Channel, this is mandatory. So Babestation24 has one too. Otherwise they weren´t there.
This men/women is in constant contact with the authorities and has to ensure that the channel follows the rules.

There was once a documentary of a "Jugendschutzbeauftragter" of a german PayTV- Erotic Channel. They showed his work. Everytime they were trying to push the boundary the channel just asks the authorities via him. Simple as that. The authorities weigh what they are planning to do and say Yes or No.

So Babestation24 knows exactly what they can do and what they can´t do. The German system is build on that.
They asked first if they can use Dildos on TV and they´ve obviously got a Yes. So there is no "legal step too far".

Technically the blur that they use is far too weak from time to time. You can cleary see the pussy sometimes. But the authorities seem to tolerate that too.

And I don´t know where you got that from that the German authorities are trying to wipe these kinds of channels from the TV. As long as you follow the rules you can show what you want. To just say "we don´t want erotic on TV" is not enough in Germany. To try to ban a channel simply on that base contravenes with several laws of Freedom in Germany. Such as "Independence to open a business" or "Free choice of a workplace."

The EU installed a law which says that you can´t show porn on TV. This was always the case in Germany so that law changed nothing here.