Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion

(23-04-2012 17:57 )SteveHG Wrote:  Let me guess what will happen on Extreme tonight. Carla will do 3 sessions (OK if you like her), Megan will prattle on about how Lori will be joining her, how there's no rules, legs open etc. What will actually happen is Lori will keep disappearing from her endless stints on the main channels but somehow not actually appear on Extreme until the last 5 mins of the last Naked session, and proceed to rub Carla's leg for a bit while remaining covered up. In the meantime several punters who are unaware of this scam will have signed up to watch what they thought was a fully naked show and will end up extremely pissed off and vow not to go on here again.
Anyone want to take a bet on this happening?

Just checked with ladbrokes and the odds on it raining sometime in the next 200 years are actually longer.

for fucks sake now you're repeating stuff on the same night?!!!! If i find a plot i'll let you have it back as you've obviously lost it.


Yeah, yeah, yeah we know this post'll get moved as we don't want to upset babestation do we?

(24-04-2012 12:27 )m100 Wrote:  for fucks sake now you're repeating stuff on the same night?!!!! If i find a plot i'll let you have it back as you've obviously lost it.


Yeah, yeah, yeah we know this post'll get moved as we don't want to upset babestation do we?

have you even read the previous 50 odd posts?

(24-04-2012 12:34 )terence Wrote:  

(24-04-2012 12:27 )m100 Wrote:  for fucks sake now you're repeating stuff on the same night?!!!! If i find a plot i'll let you have it back as you've obviously lost it.


Yeah, yeah, yeah we know this post'll get moved as we don't want to upset babestation do we?

have you even read the previous 50 odd posts?

Have you? Many of them are mine!

My point which seems to have gone way over your head is that babestation is allowed to dictate what is posted in the 'on babestation extreme tonight thread' meaning that any references to the programming such as that i made then appear out of context when moved. That clear enough for you?

(24-04-2012 13:50 )m100 Wrote:  My point which seems to have gone way over your head is that babestation is allowed to dictate what is posted in the 'on babestation extreme tonight thread' meaning that any references to the programming such as that i made then appear out of context when moved. That clear enough for you?

BS doesn't dictate that at all, utter nonsense.
The thread is clearly marked (reference only) meaning no discussion. This is the chat thread, so any discussion about the programming belongs here. Exactly the same happens in the other channels sections as well.

That clear enough for you?

So babestation didn't post some time ago 'can we keep this thread to the schedule' (or words to that effect) and you aren't moving non-schedule posts to comply with that?

(26-04-2012 17:09 )babestation Wrote:  #BabestationTV: Watch Michelle Thorne Tonight on #BabestationTV xx

Is going to be a nude show or a semi nude show? (still going to have her clothes on like ALWAYS!!!)

Talk about flash the gash...Camilla awesome as always....

i wonder if lori will ever show properly,she keeps promising and never does

(26-04-2012 23:20 )mrvrs Wrote:  i wonder if lori will ever show properly,she keeps promising and never does

They're taking shorter odds on a snowball's chances in hell I'm afraid. It's all part of scam I'm afraid which you will swiftly realise if you pay for Extreme for any length of time.
There's is only one girl (the advertised one) who is going to show anything. There is then a lot of talk about how the other girls (usually Lori,Tiffany or Geri) are going to join her, no rules, legs open etc, but this doesn't happen. If they go on Extreme at all, it is for the last 5 minutes of the last "Naked" session and they will be fully covered, often more than they do on the normal channels.
BS are obviously hoping there are enough new victims, er customers who don't know about this scam and are prepared to stump up 5 quid in the vain hope of seeing something.