Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

(18-09-2010 15:37 )eagle_si Wrote:  Yes Chris, that is indeed Natalia. And if you think she's gorgeous, wait till you see her housemate

you mean theres someone she lives with who is as hot as she, interesting.

thanks eagle

I'd just like to thank all the cap & vid makers for posting last nights sessions.

I had, had a very busy day yesterday, and travelled a lot of miles. So unfortunately, I could not keep my eyes open any longer, so I crashed out at around 01:00am.

Cheers.

(18-09-2010 09:23 )HEX!T Wrote:  if she didn't make her quota's then the channel has no option but to let her go. there is no madness in it, just economics.

sometimes theres a trade off between looks and personality, a girl may have the looks but may be dull as dishwater on the phones... if thats the case, it wouldn't matter who the girl is or how hard she tried to be visually pleasing, callers would just not bother calling, and no calls means no income.

you will find if you hang here long enough a lot of guys blame other forum members who express there opinions, and try to blame them for there favorite girls leaving. often the truth is much more mundane than the conspiracy's that float about. it is nearly always just economics.

You are probably right about this. Maybe even you must be right. Yet we always had to wait an age for her to read our texts (and it was always worth the wait of course) because she seemed to be constantly receiving phone calls. So it is surprising if she still didn't raise enough money for the channel.

(18-09-2010 15:37 )eagle_si Wrote:  Yes Chris, that is indeed Natalia. And if you think she's gorgeous, wait till you see her housemate

Who's the housemate? I am imagining a Christopher Eccleston style madman who lives in the attic*



* This post is not to be taken seriously in anyway shape or form

(18-09-2010 19:13 )debsandfiona Wrote:  You are probably right about this. Maybe even you must be right. Yet we always had to wait an age for her to read our texts (and it was always worth the wait of course) because she seemed to be constantly receiving phone calls. So it is surprising if she still didn't raise enough money for the channel.

well there are other reasons:
the girls got a better of offer more money and took it.
the girl was a deva.
the girl was incapable of working with the staff.

then again dannie had only been with them a week or so and said when she started that she was there for a trial, to see how it worked out.
as you keep saying you txt her, but elite hardly ever bother with reading txts maybe 1-2 times a day if your lucky and because im a night owl i tend to see the 5:30 am slot and dannie was struggling for calls at the beginning of most of her morning shifts.
thus i give her the benafit of the doubt and call the decision to let her go an economical 1.

Well that was wierd i was watching Hazel and could here Hannahs intro.

i'm gonna give you my opinion on this shite. there is two types of viewers .
1: there are people who don't care about realism. they see a nice looking girl, do what they have to do and move on.
2: the rest of us. now i know the channels are restricted on what they can show. but they're missing the point! do you want to know whats better than charlie or caty nearly showing us all of their nooks and crannys (sorry). two girls (whomever) caresing eachother, plenty of eye contact, not to much giggling, and LOTS of kissing. not kissing without tougue, kissing with tongue!. it's lesbian erotica 101. no chance of elite getting fined. simples.

do you know what might make money? an encripted, pay nightly channel, like babestation exterme,only instead of the occasional live simulated sex show costing £5, have two hot girls, or more, passionately making out, and charge £1 for the night! you could repeat shows after you got a decent back catalogue and take requests for pair ups!. it really is that easy!

or maybe i'm full of shite!

sorry m8 its been proven it doesn't work tvx have an encrypted show and its not really making much in the way of money. you immediately alienate i high percentage of your viewers (potential callers) along with a percentage of callers (they dont want to pay twice) just so the girls can show pussy. tvx have low call rates and survive, but thats partly because there other businesses are helping cover the costs.
the real shit of it is, that ofcom class phone sexchat as an advertisement for premium lines, and not a sexually arousing show for viewers with participation.
because of this the sexual content cant be justified as being in context, the sexual content must be contained to the chat only. so ofcom can legally get away with there fines... i know eccle's wont like this but it is the crux of the matter. until ofcom re-classify the shows for sexual content and admit viewer arousal as being the primary goal of the show, they wont be able to show pussy unless the channel is encrypted.

hexit, i would personally pay £1 for a nights viewing. it doesn't have to be sexually explict. imagine two girls, say danica and caty cole, making out passionately for half an hour. if you got enough girls and had enough content you could show repeats. maybe update once or twice a week. that's what i would like personally. i can dream!!

thing is m8 no channels would go as low as 1 pound per night. maybe 30 pounds a month but not 1 pound per night, the reason is that out of that pound they would have to pay a percentage to the company that handles the money say ccbill. the bigger the amount the less of a percentage they have to pay. so 30 pounds would give maybe 25 percent while 1 pound would maybe be 35 percent or more, because the transaction has to be handled on a daily basis instead of a monthly 1. you may have potentially more customers at the lower price but unlikely enough to warrant the lower percentages.

http://businesscenter.ccbill.com/pricing.php