Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

(07-07-2021 15:13 )manchild Wrote:  Does anyone know of Kayleigh Wanless is moving to 66? She showed up on the guide last night for later in the week but now it's disappeared again. Just wondered if it's real and happening.

Well, it seems I was right all along

(13-07-2021 22:00 )manchild Wrote:  

(07-07-2021 15:13 )manchild Wrote:  Does anyone know of Kayleigh Wanless is moving to 66? She showed up on the guide last night for later in the week but now it's disappeared again. Just wondered if it's real and happening.

Well, it seems I was right all along

Yep was a bit was a webcam show from her house in Spain, she wasn't giving much away when j watch all head and shoulders everything else on pervcam , not the comeback I was hoping for lol,

S66 is now just another cam site.most of the models have not been in their studio,doubt if they know its location

The big thing to note about the current situation at 66: There is now no such thing as a free stream on the Age Verified sections of 66's main site. Those guys that can log in to see these streams have all paid for the privilege of being able to do so on there. And have paid recently. That alone should see a big shift in logged in punters' expectations for the quality of the services on offer in those streams.

Also, if the AV streams are worthy of paying credits for this "full access" to, then why are the same streams available to view on the third party sites? Why not make viewing them what guys are paying for period? Surely restricting any amount of access implies the streams' contents ought to good enough for the access restrictions to be total. Why resort to the current half way house arrangement? Shouldn't the quality of the basic content and entertainment/tease on offer be such that these streams can stand alone? Make the content the very reason to be logging in and subbing (or effectively subbing by regular top ups). Make it to see them.

Or is it that they leave these things on third party sites in part to justify putting out the same old crap on them - with cropped head and shoulders composition, dodgy angles and the rest. Honestly, don't you think if 66 had the courage of its convictions in pushing for paid subscription access they should stop all outside availability and improve the basic content on show? But no, it seems they want to maintain the cheeky ability to call these streams "free" somehow.

So, as it is atm, a lot of guys are paying, and paying on at least a monthly basis, just for access to a few chatboxes and to have the ability to interact therein; but to interact with only the same self-censored basic visuals they had before. The cynic in me is left with the toxic impression 66 are maintaining third party access in part to stave off any great calls for change in content on the AV streams. IOW, as ever, they want the elements of the status quo that favours them to stay the same whilst improving their lot elsewhere. Well, how about improving the basic output for once - for the new money being garnered. Offer proper change for once and more guys might just buy into it. Self-serving tinkering just don't cut it any more. The competition is too much for that.

(15-07-2021 12:20 )Freeloaderthatsme Wrote:  S66 is now just another cam site.

But with atrocious, 1998 stream quality.

If i was a paying customer i would expect better stream quality, especially from a show broadcast from the studio. Do the people in the gallery actually monitor what is going to the streams, or do they just watch the raw footage and think everything is hunky dory?
If i was paying for this crap i would be demanding my money back.

^It’s like trying to watch those dodgy German porn films on the European channels on Sky back in the day

^It is Jennifer Jade turn tonight to be on the crap stream,do they not have a clue how to fix it.Turn it off then on again.

^I note when searching in the web browser for studio66 they call the programme high quality...

S66CAMS | Free high quality webcam shows with the UK's ..

Once upon a time maybe but they must be getting close to having a call from the trading standards folk with the quality of this broadcast

Darelle's stream quality (from home) today has been shite... Reminds me of those 90's cctv systems that take still images every few seconds