Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

Cali looking hot as always-no topless stuff anymore but hey ho, we've got used to that now. Eve is looking very very hot, I wonder what we can expect from her tonight. Less said about Ella Jolie the better-beautiful girl of course but ultinately very disappointing, no idea what possessed her to come back to S66.

(29-08-2019 22:50 )GMach1 Wrote:  Cali looking hot as always-no topless stuff anymore but hey ho, we've got used to that now. Eve is looking very very hot, I wonder what we can expect from her tonight. Less said about Ella Jolie the better-beautiful girl of course but ultinately very disappointing, no idea what possessed her to come back to S66.

Same camera jerk on shift tonight apparently What seems like the obligatory close up again now!!

(29-08-2019 22:50 )GMach1 Wrote:  no idea what possessed her to come back to S66.

Maybe she has bills to pay, like the rest of us

(29-08-2019 19:23 )Lemtu Wrote:  

(29-08-2019 13:00 )covkid Wrote:  5 hours of Clare if she bothers to turn up

Nope, removed from the schedule again.

No insult meant here, but she represents what S66 need to change...that is too much repetition!

It is definitely time to give the camera job to the girls themselves!! Cali isn't on perv cam I don't think, so isn't showing anything that would be beyond the rules for widescreen shots

It's 23:36 on a Thursday night and 3 'models' fully clothed and no tits out!

S66 , Sideview66, on a massive downward spiral

Shocking!

I have never seen so much fool acting with a woman on a nightshow trying to make sure her tits or nipples dont get seen while she playing with & felling them up.

Which is what Cali has been doing all night like my god woman get over yourself Cali we have seen your tits for years on Babestation.

What where they thinking putting that show on, if they want to do an hour tease show with Cali at 4 am that's fine but for the love of God don't waste a whole night on her, if the was booked and not just her doing it because no night girls where available then 66 should be asshamed of them selfs as she has said she will never show her boobs she should not be anywhere near nights,
And what's up with Ella before her break she always got her boobs out which made her Dom shows ok as still something to see but now the boobs are staying covered it's all just a bit pointless ,
Seams to me 66 is giving up on try to be mainstream as they can't compete with the other 2 channels and are intended looking for those small niche markets ,

The TV shows are not there as entertainment channels - they are there as a device to encourage people to spend money - same as the shopping channels. Basically they don't worry too much about what the non-paying viewer wants to see - they pander to those who want to spend/waste their money calling them.

The comments above about foot shows - I agree with, but the fault is not necessarily those of the girls. They need to get-in the calls, and if a group of people have discovered a girl has pandered to their fetish they will continue to call her (think Ella Jolie). It's up to people who don't like ffetish to phone in and stop the calls being dominated by the fetishists.

I can accept tease shows as being just that - a tease, preferably with sexy lingerie, or even, dare I say it?, tit tape to preserve some modesty(!), but without the necessity of nudity. However full-on night shows should have some degree of nudity.

Final rant - I don't understand some of the girls. One of them has, on various modelling sites she has signed-up to, model profiles that says she won't do "cheesy pin-up style photoshoots" as she has cinematography qualifications and wishes to be taken seriously as a cinematographer. However she is prepared to be a daytime girl who actively encourages use of the pervcam, with panties round her knees, and appears on the daytime web.

^ It's likely about longterm visibility of the result is it not; what can be kept lowkey and what can't. If a model agrees a shoot, she has no control over the life of the images produced. They could end up anywhere. With the net that becomes very likely. Whereas with perv material she, IIRC, retains copyright over any footage and thus can, in theory, block any illegal systematic distribution.

It may seem 'have your cake and eat it' to some but it's a perfectly practical judgement call on what risks the women is willing to run in order to make a living as far as I can see.