Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

^Po-tay-to, po-tah-to!

(16-11-2015 10:35 )TheProf Wrote:  Last night has to have had one the grossest 'double up' mismatches in this troubled channel's history.
We had the slow, measured, erotic teasing of Lola trying desperately to serve her callers against the demented, attention-seeking, childish antics of Kerrie Lee.
This just did not work - and I resisted calling the show because I found the visual presentation totally unacceptable.
Does anyone from this channel actually watch the output?
If there has to be 2 babes at the same time - at least make some attempt to match the girls up in terms of quality and style. Grrr

im not a big fan of either but to me Kerrie is by far the better performer, i suppose Lola will have more fans just cos she's got natural tits, natural girls are usually quite popular no matter how boring they are

Kerrie plays to the chav loving elements Lola is more sensual and sexual performer what ever gets them calls Bouncing up and down like a looney doesnt make her a better peformer its like lori and ashley emma. sometimes less movement is more

Until Kandi and Kerrie Lee get all night solo stints I am going to be an even more grumpy c#nt than usual .

(16-11-2015 17:49 )HannahsPet Wrote:  Kerrie plays to the chav loving elements Lola is more sensual and sexual performer what ever gets them calls Bouncing up and down like a looney doesnt make her a better peformer its like lori and ashley emma. sometimes less movement is more

Yeah i agree Kerrie can be a bit OTT sometimes but she's not as bad as Lori, Lola doesn't look sensual to me she was dull as dishwater when i watched her for a bit last night, even if i found her attractive i'd still think she was boring, just like i think Alice Goodwin and Levi are boring even though i prefer to watch them over someone like Beth who is a better performer

At the end of the day our judgement on a girl is usually based on looks, there are people who prefer to watch Ella Jolie and Lola rather than Madison Rose and Danni Harwood even though their style of performance are poles apart, yet people complain about poor shows what is a good show exactly? no offence but if Lola looked like Kerrie Lee i bet you wouldn't enjoy her "slow and sensual" shows

(14-11-2015 02:50 )snookered147 Wrote:  Is there no end to this channels uselessness?
Plummetting new depths of dismal incompetence.

I suspect that Studio 66 are doing OK at the moment. We all know what happens when a channel is really incompetent, as we saw it with Sin TV. If a channel get's things wrong it simply doesn't last very long. And then there was Euro Babes of course, gone in a matter of days.

I think they do very well with daytime and cam so as long as they aren't losing a tonne of money with nights (which i doubt they are) they are fine.

Sin TV did indeed seem like an incompetent business model for sure.
S66 in my view and this is only my opinion are incompetent in terms of providing a worthwhile visual spectacle worthy of a nightshow product. There is pitifully little variety or visual sexual stimulus. S66 has imo turned into a ruthless money making machine with all these double babe stints. There are obviously enough calls coming in to keep things ticking over but I can't help feeling that in this regard that with a better visual product S66 would grow even stronger.
Making money may well be what it is all about but I for one will not spend my money on the large majority of the current S66 output and this is coming from a prolific caller to nightshows down the years.

well, currently there is a de-facto duopoly on this market, so i'm sure that s66 are doing ok at the moment....despite the bad quality of the night-shows (because of the 2-4-1 thing)

I See becky is down to do a daytime extra show again tonight