Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

(12-02-2012 17:17 )StanTheMan Wrote:  

(12-02-2012 15:17 )mrmann Wrote:  I would love to see the white sheet make another return, but with the women being allowed to do whatever they want to each other while behind it.

That would be fun and I can't see why they couldn't get away with it. Does anyone know what Ofcom say about non-visual, real sexual interaction?

Don't know, but I think it will be fine for Babestation, especially that it's behind a sheet, and essentially just shadows. If we can see decent 2-4-1s that are not in shadow, then I don't see why we can't see more behind the sheet

(12-02-2012 17:23 )mrmann Wrote:  

(12-02-2012 17:17 )StanTheMan Wrote:  

(12-02-2012 15:17 )mrmann Wrote:  I would love to see the white sheet make another return, but with the women being allowed to do whatever they want to each other while behind it.

That would be fun and I can't see why they couldn't get away with it. Does anyone know what Ofcom say about non-visual, real sexual interaction?

Don't know, but I think it will be fine for Babestation, especially that it's behind a sheet, and essentially just shadows. If we can see decent 2-4-1s that are not in shadow, then I don't see why we can't see more behind the sheet

I be damned if I am paying £30 plus quid a call to see just a shadow. I want to see the girl I am calling and that can be naked, topless, clothed, lying on a bed, sat on a see through chair, on a puke blue chair or stood up. Why would anyone paying want to see a girl making little bunny rabbits with her hands

(12-02-2012 17:23 )mrmann Wrote:  

(12-02-2012 17:17 )StanTheMan Wrote:  

(12-02-2012 15:17 )mrmann Wrote:  I would love to see the white sheet make another return, but with the women being allowed to do whatever they want to each other while behind it.

That would be fun and I can't see why they couldn't get away with it. Does anyone know what Ofcom say about non-visual, real sexual interaction?

Don't know, but I think it will be fine for Babestation, especially that it's behind a sheet, and essentially just shadows. If we can see decent 2-4-1s that are not in shadow, then I don't see why we can't see more behind the sheet

If they're going to hide a girl under a sheet, they should save it for Halloween

I must admit too I'm not really a fan of the white sheet either, it's not even a cock tease the way it is done, as for the chair (not the electric one ofcourse) that to me works great as a prop, however you can't beat the Babestation motorbike they had on not too long ago, babes and bike's. great combination, but apart from that still a pretty good line up of babes tonight, thank fuck I don't have to work tommorow

Not bad!

If I have one minor complaint, it's that the shadows are a bit duller tonight, whereas last week they were more defined as the lighting was outlining them better. I think another lighting source behind/below the main backdrop would make their outlines better. I like the steam though! It's like the opening to Risky Business, with the woman in the shower!

Babestation is currently the only channel that is being the most creative, and they are succeeding!

Wow, it's foggy in the Babestation studio tonight. A real pea-souper.

has lori gone walkabout like amanda did also tonight ?,bafles me sometimes this show does !

nope she's just reappeared on bs1 with the fookin see through chair!!!!!! bs does baffle me to when it comes to gaps the babes between breaks sometimes a couple of hours

I'm just about going blind with all this nakedness going on at Babestation these days did I say that I don't have to work tommorow

trying to watch bs last night was like the very first outside broadcasts on tv black and white and in a set recreating a london smog.surely ofcom will be delighted that now you dont even get a decent view of boobs in a late night show.what next?the shower set but with a plastic shower curtain?absolutely dire.