SCIROCCO
Banned
Posts: 759
Joined: Dec 2009
|
RE: Back to the golden age.(if only)
Another tortuous night of tame output. Woke at 2am to get a drink and had a flick thru the 900s. Some girls weren't even topless and had knickers that would have gained Mary Whitehouse's approval. For fook's sake show us some action before you all go out of business.
|
|
28-10-2011 06:29 |
|
RESPONSIBLE ADULT
Banned
Posts: 898
Joined: Jun 2010
|
Without a fight
Remember just a couple of years ago, Danica, what shows she would put on. She would lay on that white couch and keep us enthralled for hours on end. The sexiest girl that the babechannels as ever had, by a country mile. She was the standard that every other girl should have strived to emulate. But "WOW" how things have come of the rails since, we have no longer got an adult channel to think of, we have been left with a watered down version that no longer as any right to call itself so. What pisses me off more than Ofcom is the total lack of any fight to stem this tide of censorship by the programme makers. If I had my way the whole lot should call it a day and hand over this sort of programming to the internet. But then again why should the makers quit when they still get people to happily part with their money.
|
|
23-11-2011 17:41 |
|
StanTheMan
Banned
Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
|
RE: Without a fight
Do we really need yet another Ofcom-bashing thread?
I'm not even sure I agree with your sentiments Re. Danica. I very quickly lost interest in her style, and if you're talking about benchmark-setting girls, there are plenty of others far more deserving of the accolade.
|
|
23-11-2011 18:19 |
|
RESPONSIBLE ADULT
Banned
Posts: 898
Joined: Jun 2010
|
RE: Without a fight
(23-11-2011 18:19 )StanTheMan Wrote: Do we really need yet another Ofcom-bashing thread?
I'm not even sure I agree with your sentiments Re. Danica. I very quickly lost interest in her style, and if you're talking about benchmark-setting girls, there are plenty of others far more deserving of the accolade.
Stan, take a minute out of your no doubt busy schedule and just read my thread again and you will hopefully see that it is not bashing Ofcom. I have left that up to you, as you have done lot's of it in the past. In fact you seem to be a master at it. And as far as Danica is concerned that is my personal view and not up for discussion. Stan just read the thread title and comment on that.
|
|
23-11-2011 22:15 |
|
Scottishbloke
Banned
Posts: 8,304
Joined: Jan 2010
|
RE: Back To The Golden Age (If Only)
Well last night was the first time I'd been able to watch the babe channels having been unable to do so due to work commitments the previous 6 nights and what a snore fest it turned out to be, as far as any golden age is concerned, we've had fleeting moments of greatness only to disapear as quickly as they had started, it was tortuous viewing, even the big hitters such as Lucy Summers had relatively quite nights which just reaffirmed all that is wrong with the babe channels, they are in a massive slump right now, I'm really at a loss right now as to what exactly has gone wrong in the Adult Industry with regards to late night erotic fun on the Babe Channels, Sportxxx was the last channel that really stuck 2 fingers up to Ofcom and this is something we're unlikely to see repeated, as for Ofcom, they are still here raining havoc down and further cementing their place in this nanny state mentality which these days is far from a democracy anymore, all we can do now is hope for change as that is about the only thing that we have left, I just hope that in 2012 things begin to pick up and that the rules are drastically altered, well the high court now says that swearing no longer has the harm to cause to offence, maybe they could too say the same thing about the vagina
|
|
24-11-2011 20:08 |
|
StanTheMan
Banned
Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
|
RE: Back To The Golden Age (If Only)
(26-11-2011 02:20 )eccles Wrote: These days its sometimes difficult to tell the difference between daytime and late night fare.
I'm guessing you don't mean that in the same, positive way people were saying it two years ago?
(This post was last modified: 26-11-2011 04:59 by StanTheMan.)
|
|
26-11-2011 04:59 |
|