Favourite Asian Babe

Got to be Kipsi for me. God I hope she's all woman with no supprises

(27-06-2011 08:23 )pascal1645 Wrote:  Got to be Kipsi for me. God I hope she's all woman with no supprises

Which one's Kipsi?? It's really not that difficult to tell. Here's a tip; if it looks like Desperate Dan in drag, it's one of the guys.

(27-06-2011 08:23 )pascal1645 Wrote:  Got to be Kipsi for me. God I hope she's all woman with no supprises

Kipsi is definitely all woman - only on daytimes, though- often wears green with her boobs bursting to overflowing - oozing sexual tension behind her cute smiles and coy looks - given all the encouragement she pushes the watershed to the absolute limit !

(27-06-2011 17:38 )vernnybay Wrote:  Kipsi is definitely all woman - only on daytimes, though- often wears green with her boobs bursting to overflowing - oozing sexual tension behind her cute smiles and coy looks - given all the encouragement she pushes the watershed to the absolute limit !

Oh, her! Yeah, definatley all woman as vernnybay says. How can you NOT tell either way?

(20-06-2011 20:46 )StanTheMan Wrote:  

(20-06-2011 18:50 )onetruelad Wrote:  Nice LB good personality and always stays hard

Oh, come on!! May I ask, given that you're obvioulsy gay, why you're browsing a babe forum?

Being presumptuous, aren't you? onetruelad could be bi-sexual. Any problems with people who swing both ways perusing the forum threads, Herr Doktor?! Still, if you did call it right, then maybe it says something about Balloon's appeal. It would make sense for his/her sexual ambiguity – a highly feminine form minus one obvious component - is alluring to people with a range of sexual preferences. I'm straight but am certainly turned on by Balloon's performances.

All this brings up a related issue: why is there so little gay satellite material available? Across the range of the adult channels there's, what, a couple of gay contact/text 'n' date shows, and one solitary - non FTA - gay programme channel? Maybe Ofcom somehow has something to do with this state of affairs too? Perhaps when they haven't been clamping down on explicit hetero content, they've been suppressing FTA gay material? Ofcom's been characterised enough times by those who oppose it in here as an organisation run by dogmatic, straight-laced reactionaries. A draconian stance on homosexuality would certainly fit right in with that sort of profile.

The lack of fuss made by the anti-Ofcomers with regard to the lack of gay FTA material is surprising given the lofty way they've portrayed the good 'fight' against Ofcom (Power to the people! Preventing the broadcast of the sort of freebie satellite porn 'we'd' like to see is an infringement of human rights!) Maybe when and if Ofcom falls, and we enter the sort of progressive, liberal and tolerant era that every Ofcom opposer would seem to want, the imbalance between gay and straight content will rightly be redressed.

(27-06-2011 23:06 )Addison Wrote:  Being presumptuous, aren't you? onetruelad could be bi-sexual. Any problems with people who swing both ways perusing the forum threads, Herr Doktor?! Still, if you did call it right, then maybe it says something about Balloon's appeal. It would make sense for his/her sexual ambiguity – a highly feminine form minus one obvious component - is alluring to people with a range of sexual preferences. I'm straight but am certainly turned on by Balloon's performances.

I have some news for you, Addison. If, knowing full well that Balloon is a man, you are turned on by his performances, you're not straight.

If we are going to label people and not adopt the trendy attitude that sex is sex and whatever your preference makes no difference, then straight men like women only. Gay men like other men, and bisexual like both. You may well be bisexual, but you're certainly not straight if what you say is true and hasn't just been said for the sake of the discussion.

Stan, it's 2011, not 1911, and regardless of whether or not you consider it trendy, people are now openly acknowledging what's always been true: the boundaries that are supposed to segregate gender designation and sexual preferences are not rigid but in flux.

You can call me what you want. I consider myself straight. I'm attracted to, and have only had physical relationships with, women, and the only 'men' I've ever been attracted to (and I suspect this is true of loads of other straight guys) have been Asian and highly feminized – lady boys, shemales, kathoeys, call them what you will. I've always found it intriguing the way my libido can be 'fooled' in this way. It's never outraged me, I've never felt conned. I know that because Balloon et al weren't born with vaginas, you'd like us to believe that they're built all over like Desperate Dan in a bikini, but t'ain't even vaguely true, is it? You're letting your knowledge of something you can't actually see and verify, override the appreciation and possible enjoyment of what you can. For me, Balloon is physically more attractive than many babes on other channels (chivalry prevents me from naming them): prettier face, hotter body, implants that look as good as fake boobs on any 'proper' babe, beautifully svelte hips and legs.

You won't let yourself accept any of this, though. And by your reckoning any woman born as woman is going to be more alluring to a straight guy than a shemale, no matter how much of a knock-out the latter looks, purely on the basis of what is and isn't between the legs. Look Stan, why don't you go and occupy your thoughts with some natural-born women:



And leave us 'bi-s' to enjoy Desperate Dan and his mates:

I don't agree with all you have said there Addison but credit where it's due for a point well made!

Indeed, vampire - t'was a fine post and beautifully argued.

He's right, though, I can't accept any of what he said. I'm a very shallow and blinkered person when it comes to shemales, and that's the way I cope with it best. They have a dick between their legs, therefore they're men, and anyone sexually attracted to such is not 'straight' in my opinion.

But in all honestly, I really do fail to see how people find them attractive at all. This is not just my blinkered, bigoted viewpoint dictating, but they stand out a mile. In the example you've given above, Addison, I'd have picked (or I should say correctly identified) every single one of those five shemales out of a line-up of 1000 real women, without touching, asking to see naked, or hearing their voice. Fair enough, they certainly don't look like men, but nor do they look like women. I suppose they look precisley like what they are; men parading as women.

In terms of dedication to the 'female form', it should be noted the care that Shemale Balloon has taken over her implants. The only scars she has are buried in her armpits and Sammy [since left] confirmed to me that Balloon's boobs feel as soft and as 'real' as any woman's [well perhaps not every woman's !].

.