RIP Bang Babes : Gone Bust...

Just think the amount they earn aint as much as other celebs who do far less work for their money and who don't look anywhere near as sexy as the girls.

(30-11-2010 17:31 )Chilly Wrote:  

(30-11-2010 17:29 )sarah-smith Wrote:  what are you going to randomly go threw all the bang babes girls untill you guess my name lol perfetic.... keep guessing guys.

Ah, there speaks a troll.

your all sooo perfetic getting jealous of how much money we make and as for bonus system there isint one at bangbabes everyone is on diffrent money cos no two girls earn the same....

Emily Charlotte Jones less educated sister

To be honest we don't give a fuck to be fair. I know one very well as she has been in the industry for a while and is dating one of my good mates and the rates do vary quite wildly, on shift,channel and popularity.

(30-11-2010 16:55 )sarah-smith Wrote:  why wouldnt maths be my strong point im very good at maths thanks everything ive said in my above post is correct... girls take home between 10,000 and 25,000 people like michelle thorne are on 300p/h hollyjames is on 200 p/h and danni harwoord 150 p/h......

So salaries range from £1,200,000 - £3,000,000 per year?

Just how likely is that?

Are these estimates correct? 1000 - 2000 a night for the top women? That can't be right, can it? I know some make good money, but I remember hearing about what Lori Buckby made, and while it was decent for what she does, it was nowhere near as high (Rumored to be at most 48,000 per year) as what you all are saying about the Bang Babes women. Regardless of any magazines or websites these women might do, are some of them really getting paid this much? It doesn't annoy me at all, and I'm not a jealous person, but I find this info interesting, as it gives me more of a perspective on what it takes to make good money in this industry. I thought with the economy the way it is, that the babe channel women weren't getting paid as much as that, but I guess if you become a celebrity of sorts through your callers and through the photoshoots, that it's possible to earn that. I do think the 150 - 300 per hour stuff is nonsense though!!! That's obviously not true.

It's none of our business what any of the women make, but I still find this info interesting.

I've heard that it's what sarah smith said for an hour was for a shift.

(26-11-2010 12:36 )mikeboob Wrote:  Prior to 1 September 2010, the material broadcast by the Licensees was subject to the Broadcasting Code, which includes the following specific provisions: . Licensees must therefore comply with the relevant Standards Code which applies to the material broadcast.

• Rule 1.17: “Material equivalent to the British Board of Film Classification ("BBFC") R18 rating must not be broadcast at any time.”

Of the 48 breaches of the Broadcasting Code:
• 1 related to material found to be in breach of Rule 1.17/7

What in the world was that?

I think that's obvious: Amanda + Jemma + Lollipop

This was the ONLY real breech of the Code - all other's being trumped-up charges regarding 'offence' and relying on OFCOM's own utter intolerance, bigotry and inept 'guidance'.

However, the FACT remains that R18-type material is legally classed as harmless and CANNOT be banned from TV without proper evidence of harm. OFCOM admitted as much in 2005 yet, proceeded with their ILLEGAL ban all the same.

Moreover, evidence of OFCOM's prejudice against sexy material is plain for all to see in Rule 1.18 - i.e. "material designed to cause sexual arousal will not be justified by the context". Well, I'm afraid porn is designed to turn people on and its content is most certainly justifed in that context.

BM should use that £157,000 (which I hope they didn't cough-up) and take OFCOM to the High Court to explain their irrational, illegal and discriminatory piece of shit excuse for a Standards Code.

does anyone know how to get hold of all the regs?

(30-11-2010 17:28 )tsurugi Wrote:  I was told by a current "bangbabe" that it was £650 per night shift basic but with the chance to earn bonuses.

Who to believe.......

I'd go with that.

If you add things up if a girl was on the phone for a full hour that's only £90 plus a few listeners/callers on hold and few using the picture service they could possible touch £500 an hour

Now take away all the staff cost/building and rates/ transmission costs and other bits and pieces they wont be much left for profit.

If the channels could make as much as Sarah reckoned non of the channels over the years would Of gone out of buisness


Of course I could be way off, if so fair play to them.