Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

(02-06-2010 20:44 )matt38 Wrote:  I'm going to mix it up some more, if as you say Live 960 is a Bluebird channel, has not Eden Black appeared once on a Babestation channel for one night.

Yes, absolutely correct.

(02-06-2010 22:12 )RRROGER Wrote:  Nobody has yet answered my question about LinseyDawnMackenzie, regular appearances on BS day & night shows + porn movies for Bluebird Films, so who the fuck does she work for; everybody sneers at my suggestion that Bluegird & Cellcast are in collusion, is there anything to suggest that they're not,so why all the secrecy underlying all the Bluebird propaganda.......

Bluebird have said they have an agreement with Cellcast that they won't poach BS girls and that in return Cellcast will allow them to 'borrow' girls for their videos.

(02-06-2010 23:19 )leefett1980 Wrote:  Why why why are babestation doing the split screen crap again!? It's rubbish, why not just have 2 girls on together? How much attention do you think we have? I don't sit watching 2 different teles at a time so why would people want to watch 2 different girls on half the screen each? That's why we have remotes so we can view a different channel, there are enough of them there to watch grrr!

They often use the 2+2 format and it has been given qualified approval by members of this forum, so it does seem rather baffling that they don't use use it as a more acceptable alternative to the split screen. As it's much more comfortable to watch you would think it would also generate more calls.

im sure when bluebird announced their first lot of signings, linsey's name was on the list. also havent bluebird confirmed 951 will be one of their sky babechannels?

(02-06-2010 23:41 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  im sure when bluebird announced their first lot of signings, linsey's name was on the list. also havent bluebird confirmed 951 will be one of their sky babechannels?

BB have recently been touting a snatchsniffing video featuring LDM & GemmaMassey & she's on BS tonight so to repeat my question....
SKY951 just restarted, supposedly aquired by BB from Cellcast before shutdown,but restarted with duplicated Cellcast show, does it matter??...who gives a toss, I know I will not be subscribing to anything BB related, no doubt much to PaulChaplin's relief..

In effect all the answers to my queries are substantiating my original long held contention that BB & Cellcast are in collusion!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

the reason for bluekiss's re-emergence may be quite simple. ofcom found partyland in breach the other month, if bluekiss is licanced the same as the rest of babestation and not like partyland then ofcom get no say.

Partyland in Breach but its so tame

The plot thickens!

Really does make you wonder who will be left standing when the dust settles. I know they're tough little buggers, but, Cockroachstation doesn't have quite the same ring to it!

(03-06-2010 06:57 )Hexit Wrote:  the reason for bluekiss's re-emergence may be quite simple. ofcom found partyland in breach the other month, if bluekiss is licanced the same as the rest of babestation and not like partyland then ofcom get no say.

PL in breach? I don't remember seeing anything about that - which bulletin was it in?

It still wouldn't explain how a Cellcast show (Bluekiss) can be on a Bluebird-owned channel (951).

I thought the different licensing for PL only applied to FV.

(03-06-2010 08:48 )vila Wrote:  It still wouldn't explain how a Cellcast show (Bluekiss) can be on a Bluebird-owned channel (951).

It's because Bluebird don't have any shows to broadcast at the moment, so they have leased 951 to Cellcast for a month or two.

At the same time as I was channelhopping the babechannels I was also watching Paige's BSXtra appearance from Tuesday night. It was on the same time frame as Rochelle's appearance on BSxtra last night and the contrasts were amazing!! In the various small bits of Rochelle I saw there were hardly any extra graphics interference whereas when Paige was on the extra graphics appeared to come on every few seconds!!

Is this a fair assessment because it doesn't seem fair to me that one girls appearances should be spoilt by excessive graphics more than ANY other girl!! They probably wouldn't get away with it with any of the other girls so why should they do it with BS's best girl (and her bad back lol!!)?

Really don't know on that one Ally,

The graphics and ads on Xtra are nowhere near as intrusive as they are on BS1 now. Window graphics, lower half OSG's and split screen mic announcements from the girls which get interrupted by a video ad. I want Tiffany to watch back her first stint on BS1 last night as I think she would be mightily p***ed off by what she sees! You know, I would really love her or one of the girls to come here and give us their review on stuff they've seen. It would make VERY interesting reading!