Xpanded Dayshow - General Chat & Discussion

Been watching Tia on and off this morning and the studio cam isn't focused on her and hasn't moved. Do you think it's technical error or has she done a Clara and sacked the camera off? I haven't seen Tia lately so not sure what other shows have been like.

(17-12-2025 10:31 )vampire555 Wrote:  Been watching Tia on and off this morning and the studio cam isn't focused on her and hasn't moved. Do you think it's technical error or has she done a Clara and sacked the camera off? I haven't seen Tia lately so not sure what other shows have been like.

Lazy producer

They actually moved the main camera for the 1st time In as long as I can recall

Instead of just facing almost straight on like is standard, as Jenna lay flat on the bed it was almost ¾ higher than usual facing more down on her, even the Christmas tree was out of sight with the just the bed In the shot

Don't know if it was something she asked for or a caller asked for but made a change from the usual view for 5-10 mins at least

What is going on with some of the daytime performances babes doing the same shows everytime they are on either sitting in that office chair for hours like Jenna yesterday or lying on there fronts

I think some of the babes need to look at there outfit choices wearing the same stuff week after week really gets boring the only one on this channel that bothers about her performances is Clara Croft every one else just goes through the motions

Plus they need better producers as they just sit back and let it happen including not moving any of the cameras into better position

Its the usual rubbish by this robber baron channel How they are still in business it a mystery or perhaps not

I don't get all this XP negativity, some on here have to be more realistic. Remember this is a Dayshow thread. Apart from the period when Bang Babes/The Pad just laughed in the face of Ofcom the Dayshows have always been static in the main. I've watched since the beginning, generally babes laying on a bed, or sat.
IMHO BS is far worse, that's if you ever get beyond the constant ads, I'll bargain they move less than the XP Daybabes. Given the choice Id pick the XP Dayshows every time, they piss all over the dire BS output.
The only bit I can agree on is the lack of direction, but that is & has always been none existent on Dayshows & not that evident on Nights, again, BS are a far worse culprit in that regard.

(02-01-2026 18:20 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote:  I don't get all this XP negativity, some on here have to be more realistic. Remember this is a Dayshow thread. Apart from the period when Bang Babes/The Pad just laughed in the face of Ofcom the Dayshows have always been static in the main. I've watched since the beginning, generally babes laying on a bed, or sat.
IMHO BS is far worse, that's if you ever get beyond the constant ads, I'll bargain they move less than the XP Daybabes. Given the choice Id pick the XP Dayshows every time, they piss all over the dire BS output.
The only bit I can agree on is the lack of direction, but that is & has always been none existent on Dayshows & not that evident on Nights, again, BS are a far worse culprit in that regard.

'Dayshows have always been static in the main. I've watched since the beginning, generally babes laying on a bed, or sat'
I could not diasagree with you more, upon review of videos of the said channels you cited suggests on many occassions they were very much 'watchable' and often i have seen many a quote on this forum citing the good old days of models doing there 'thing' but at other times you are not wrong, soime were better than others but this channel gets a consistent thread of negativity because its warranted and perhaos further suggests a wider systemic problem with the channel.

Nah, I stand by all I have said, absolutely there's been exceptions, but I know exactly what I've been watching during the days for years. But I agree it has got worse, some of this is down to stricter rules, but often self imposed, there's a general entitlement & laziness. These babes make money away from the shows so there's a lot of freewheeling & lack of effort. The XP pervcam has been a joke from start to finish, again with the occasional exception, it is a half cock version of the BS pervcam, cheaper but generally on BS it is at least in use. I honestly can't understand anyone paying for something that might happen, you could tell when it was free that it was an afterthought. Total rip off.
Clear issues at XP but still more watchable than BS. What a lot of people fail to realize the shows aren't charities, they require punters to call in, & in my experience the XP Daybabes are generally more accommodating than many BS babes.

'Nah, I stand by all I have said' - and rightly so you must but I'm afraid you are in the minority of after thoughts about this channel and its models. The models are employees not employers and regardless of what they earn elsewhere, they are required to 'perform' to a required standard and its very clear who performs and who does not and those who dont should be placed under the microscope and be open to scruitny but with a certain degree of tact andf that my friend is at the discresion of the pruducers of the show to set the benchmark but sadly they are way off the mark

^^ I think you've missed the bits where I actually agree with the majority of what you are saying. I will reiterate that this is a Dayshow, you are expecting something that will not happen. They are not really performers, nights shows most definitely, Dayshows not so much, very limited in what they can do.
Certain babes are clearly less focussed than they should be at times, but punters are still phoning these babes, if the calls stop coming in, in the required volumes it would be madness to continue employing them No amount of phone waggling will force punters to call in, they either will or they wont. The ball is really in the court of the management to get more out of the slackers.
Maybe Clara earns them so much that they can afford to carry a little excess baggage.