The best ‘sex face’?

An odd question, I know, but it was sparked by a recent tour of old favourites on the babevidz site.

Who do you think gives / gave the best ‘sex face’ while talking to callers?

This is mostly applicable to girls on the daytime shows. Some of them you could just tell were in the middle of a naughty call and were probably talking absolute filth — it was clear from their movement and facial expressions. Others were pretty inscrutable.

I always thought Emma C made it abundantly clear that she was on a naughty call. Rebecca K too when she was in a frisky mood. Macy Leigh was another.

At the opposite end were Darelle and Louisa (aka Alexandra). Both sexy as hell, don’t get me wrong, but when it comes to watching them on calls it’s hard to tell if they are being naughty or talking about the weather. Their expression never changes.

Mikki B, Gemma H and Emma Spellar in their prime were funny ones. They often had the stripper moves and facial expressions when they took a call, but — I know from experience! — could have been talking about their latest holiday or the shoes they just bought. They were just always “on”.

Am I the only one who gave a girl credit for giving “good face”?

As ever Gf is bang on.

I don't really have names for his main question - beyond the obvious Fernanda, Holly James, etc. - but I just wanted to add a little commentary to the subject (especially as this thread looks like it could do with a little boost)!

'Easy to read' babes - of the Fern, James, Emma Spellar, Cara B, Emma C sort - were all core to the appeal that brought me to the channels in the first place. And their expressiveness was indeed significant to that appeal; reflecting as it did their openly visible sexuality. (For all their focus on nipple slips and various other exposures/mishaps, it was this openess that the prudes at Ofcom TRULY couldn't stand and would, eventually, all but manage to stamp out. Meanwhile, for the right punter, it lit up the 900's as something entirely new; and can now be seen as an impactful slice of a culturally significant sub-genre).

When broken down like this we can see a babe's use of body language onscreen should be everything re. her communication to the userbase - especially so in a medium where the user most often encounters (to him) a mute arena. Facial expressiveness likewise. For day babes in particular, the latter became ever more important as restrictions on the channels hardened... Unfortunately, these aspects remain massively under spoken of in these parts. Nevertheless, I don't think it can be denied, they're incredibly important in terms of a babe's effectiveness to the shows.

Whether night or day babe, the key to that successful expressiveness is surely believability. Can the performer channel what she's supposed to be envisioning in a way that convinces those looking on that she's actually INTO what is being spoken of? Does it seem she's actually feeling whatever she's describing? From there - when doing the dirty talk/actions - it's a matter of exciting users with her apparent conviction. When done well this adds SO much on top of the basic run-of-the-mill output - for everyone not just the guys on the phone). (THIS is what tied guys to the channels, what kept them coming back, got them invested and what made them want to get directly involved on a more regular basis. This "added value" was the basis of the habit that kept the industry going in its first 15 years.)

When broken down in this way, Babe-ing can be seen as based in a form of acting. And, as with the mainstream form, the performer's face must be central to putting across the correct, properly effective, message. Without this effective messaging, the audience will never be what it could have been.

That many modern babes simply don't bother with half of what Gf is talking about just illustrates how far we've moved away from the performance-based crowd-hungry shows - and their speedily evocative efforts towards communication with a prospective mass of guys. (Instead, the industry convinced itself this incredilbly powerful method of promotion was a waste of time/effort. Not cost effective; it's quest moving from mainstream to niche users. And all it could come up with in replacement were dodgy gimmicks aimed at convincing guys the new was better than the old!) It's a big reasons why a place like Babevidz was needed in the first. That resource is now the single best way that users can see how it should be done. Because live - in the here and now - 99% of the time, the shows and nothing like what they were even 6 years ago.

I agree with all of that except one tiny thing … Cara B.

I always put her in the category of “beautiful” but not “sexy”, if that makes sense? Rochelle was another one.

Paige Tyler was at the other end of the spectrum for me. She had this way about her that would have sent an Ofcom complainer reaching for his heart pills if he ever bumped into her at Tesco.

^ You may well be right. Strangely enough, I only added Cara B as a last minute thought when thinking over names just prior to posting. Now you given me second thoughts.Cara may well fall into a third category from the others we've mentioned. "Playful" more than properly "sexified" is more like it perhaps?

It may be worth noting: Cara's commitment to her night show efforts was queried at the time IIRC. She said herself it was only the big money on offer that got her to do it. The beginning of her end on nights saw s66 accused of gaming the use of their phone system when she was on. Her after hours then petered out once the puss on perve burnt out its novelty. Seems there was no foundation to keep it going longterm. All in all, the shows always seemed just a bit of a lark to Cara.

That prompts another thought: This is something else that might play into all this actually. Don't you think that when you watched a lot of this stuff you began to see which babes were truly commited to what they where doing and which were just along for a fun ride for a while? Even when such babes would stuck around for years they never seemed particularly serious about their job shall we say. So... maybe proper commitment adds some extra bite to the way a babe puts herself across in the most heated moments? True conviction can only come with proper commitment?

Yeah, I remember the Cara B night show scam well … I was one of the ones bitching about it. If I recall — apart from her stunning looks — she had the added appeal of being a “good” daytime girl getting her kit off from time to time. The phone queues were stacked, so in an effort to maximise income, she would regularly cut you off mid-call to keep the queue moving. That was the gist of it. Great visuals — abominable business practices.

You may be right on the larger point. I’m not sure I’d call it “conviction” so much as comfort. With some girls, it was patently clear that they didn’t feel comfortable in the role and — for that reason — didn’t last very long

Kira Kadey?

I've got to be honest I'm struggling to come up with even one name on current rosters. Various reasons could account for it.
The more process driven nature of the shows certainly on BS anyway.
The boring nature of the sets doesn't help much either. And of course many callers don't do sex chat on nights let alone days. They all blabber on about inane rubbish. Trust me I have spent enough time listening in while waiting to be connected over the years.

There are a lot of fake smiles
A lot of holier than thou pouting going on . Humongous amounts of bored expressions .

The sense of babes just going through the motions and not truly enjoying their work is palpable.

Even on nightshows I am struggling to identify many convincing sex faces which is even more worrying to be honest with you.

The babeshow product is contrived at best imo.

Maybe I have just become accepting of a product that is half baked, half arsed and not being what it once was. Miserable old Snooks .

In answer to the question posed as subject of this thread, if we’re talking about purely ladies on the babeshows, 2 spring to mind. One is Ashlyn Shaw. The other is Amy Lacey https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid2954328

(25-04-2025 20:31 )Goodfella3041 Wrote:  Yeah, I remember the Cara B night show scam well … I was one of the ones bitching about it. If I recall — apart from her stunning looks — she had the added appeal of being a “good” daytime girl getting her kit off from time to time. The phone queues were stacked, so in an effort to maximise income, she would regularly cut you off mid-call to keep the queue moving. That was the gist of it. Great visuals — abominable business practices.

This was the end of my very brief calling career. Cara was the only one who stirred me enough to spend money on calls and the cut off scam stopped me pretty quickly.