(10-01-2021 14:53 )darren73 Wrote: If a babe isn't putting on a show no one is going to call
![[Image: Screenshot-20210110-134616.jpg]](https://i.pixxxels.cc/qq85Mpsw/Screenshot-20210110-134616.jpg)
Ah yes the old chicken and egg situation
![Wink Wink](images/smilies/wink.gif)
The oldest and most familiar bone of snookered contention in all his years frequenting this forum.
The ultimate stalemate provider.
Viewer/potential caller: I am not willing to call up the on screen babe at large expense until the on screen babe puts on a stimulating show worthy of the cost of the call
On screen babe: I am not willing to do anything stimulating unless and until the people at home pick up the phone and ask me to do it instead of just moaning on forums and freeloading
![Wink Wink](images/smilies/wink.gif)
.
The nightshow version of a nil-nil draw
![Tongue Tongue](images/smilies/tongue.gif)
.
A problem that has become ever more acute and complex with the passage of time and the growing influence of onlyfans and the like on one hand and tip goal induced webshows on the other. Some might say to old snooks 'May I remind the honourable gentleman every problem is in fact an opportunity?'
To which the official reply may very well be thus....
'I think the fear of the honourable snooks is that it represents an insoluble opportunity'
![laugh laugh](images/smilies/laugh.gif)
.
Back in time it really was as simple as calling up a babe to help generate a fabulous viewing spectacle. I should know. After the damage done to so many of my phone bills down the years. I thrived upon trying and often succeeding in politely persuading babes to put on a daring, dirty, horny show. The thrill was in the on phone disrobing of the babe.
No more accomplished babe has there ever been at the slow, sensual strip than Lola.
I know through repeated personal experience.
I enjoyed such thrills and spills with many a babe down the years even if my bank balance hasn't appreciated the consequence of quite frankly ludicrous phone bills.
Slowly but surely though the change in commercial model of nightshows took hold.
It created more interactive options such as pervcam, call mode variations, tip goals and a remorseless plugging of this or that.
The way babes would earn their money through channel based activity begun to change at the very same time the cost of regular calls increased beyond the old £1.53 p/m.
It changed the mentality of babes, viewers, potential punters and actual punters alike.
It allowed for a more hard nosed mentality to grip channels and babes alike in a profoundly damaging way. Babes accused of being either rip off merchants or lazy or both. Viewers accused of being freeloaders and non callers.
Forumites accused of being both keyboard warrior moaners and freeloaders.
The folks at home seemingly setting a higher required standard in order to justify the cost of all forms of interaction.
The babes sensing the opportunity of onlyfans and the like while at the same time not wanting the channel based activity to give too much away and in so doing compromise the content they may provide on such a platform.
All parties asking the question that starts "Why should I......?".
"I am not making the first move".
"Well neither am I".
Everyone sticking their tongues out at one another in a stalemate game of 'Well you started it'
![Tongue Tongue](images/smilies/tongue.gif)
.
Where does it end you might ask?
A most excellent question.
A question I can only answer through the breadth of my viewer and punter experience.
Requests that were once so easily obliged slowly but surely became denied more and more often either with little or no reason given.
Production staff luck of the draw as to who allowed the babes to do what? Maybe.
Babes not being arsed? Yeah maybe a bit of that too.
At least in the early days of transition towards a more open babeshow market place for the want of a better expression.
Calls became a lottery and an expensive one to boot.
Webshows came along.
Outcomes that once were easily generated on the telly became hidden away behind web based paywalls and tip goals even to the point of blurredcam on BS at least.
And even when goals were hit some babes failed to oblige the goal result.
Some goals were disingenuously met behind pervcam only restriction or the like.
Babes claiming a dual justification of moaning mini freeloaders on the unheralded and much maligned chat box and a desire not to give too much of a gaping open shop window to their onlyfans world.
The inexorable path down Stalemate Street remorselessly ensued with daggers drawn by both sides claiming betrayal, dishonesty and deceit.
Snooks became discouraged, disheartened, resigned to eternal frustration.
He joined various onlyfans pages which did indeed offer SOME of what he wanted at a cost. Snooks remains susceptible to that temptation.
But he is conflicted because he craves filthy nightshow sex chat.
He can't generate the perfect TELEVISION based visual spectacle by virtue of that chat much anymore Beth and a few other BS babes aside.
So his expectation bar has been amended to accomodate Xpanded and an appreciation of outfits and horny body language.
Minus the physical full undressing.
But with the compensation of old fashioned nightshow values at the core.
Snooks is torn. Dragged every which way.
Should his hand be drawn towards dagger or phone?
Should his money be drawn towards tip goal gamble or non nude sex chat?
Should he embrace the opportunity or lament the problem?
The life of a long term spender and equally long term forum member.
The babes version of an impossible contradiction in terms.
But yes ladies I really do exist.
I am a living, breathing, deluded old thing with the attention span of a doughnut, the embarrassment of phone bill carnage and the powers of temptation resistance akin to that of Donald Trump trying not to alledge hole placement fraud on a par 5 with 6 shots already hit.
But I will cope.
As I always do.
As I forever must.
Silly old snooks
![Rolleyes Rolleyes](images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
.