Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

(27-08-2018 18:39 )snookered Wrote:  It's all about ...

Ha ha! OK, fair enough.

(27-08-2018 18:39 )snookered Wrote:  I'll get my coat shall I?

As long as it's in the suitcase you can have it.

(27-08-2018 20:33 )Vowlesy13 Wrote:  I have to agree with this☝️☝️☝️. The site is really going a long way to losing a lot of customers at the minute (me included). I went on perv the other day and the girl then suggested i take her private for a better experience. I did and the screen was black, tried to exit and go back in and it remained black each time. When i checked back it had eaten up nearly 300 credits.

which makes me wonder why people still return for a second dose of their bullshit,they know full well that the blanket they have wrapped around the system they are operating is non negotiable ,so if you do delve into their trap eventually u will be ripped off and theres fuck all you can do about it,my only advice is once bitten twice shy ,we all know theres better out there and most of it is free, hyping these girls up like they are superstars and its your privilege to pay to see them is the mist most dont see through,pervcam and the way the private shows are managed will eventually be seen for what it really is,a con ,

snookered that made me laugh out loud.
It appears that the people that use the chat box are also complaining about black screens and constabntly being referred to customer service for their gripes by the duty Mr.P (while the other one has fun with the camera) I think there will come a time when some will say enough is enough, sort it out or I walk.

(27-08-2018 20:33 )Vowlesy13 Wrote:  I went on perv the other day and the girl then suggested i take her private for a better experience.

Roughly translated, that means "I've only got one mug on pervcam at the moment so I'll spin him some bullshit to get more money out of him"


Cynical, moi? Too bloody right I am.

Text the words 'MR P' to 98456 to get a pic of him shunting the tripod around a set for just £2.
Or for £4 get a random pic of Mr P walking into a lamp post outside the studio after a heavy night of fake humping.
Or for £100 get a free audio recording of a babe totally ignoring her caller while talking absolute bollocks to Mr P.

Or get all of these for a bargain £1000 and be entered into a prize draw where you could win a free pervcam video where Mr P gets up close and personal with a cardboard cut out of your favourite babe as the real one almost certainly can't make it due to errrrr yes you have guessed it a broken down unicycle .

Hard up these babes you know .

(27-08-2018 21:27 )shankey! Wrote:  

(27-08-2018 20:33 )Vowlesy13 Wrote:  I have to agree with this☝️☝️☝️. The site is really going a long way to losing a lot of customers at the minute (me included). I went on perv the other day and the girl then suggested i take her private for a better experience. I did and the screen was black, tried to exit and go back in and it remained black each time. When i checked back it had eaten up nearly 300 credits.

which makes me wonder why people still return for a second dose of their bullshit,they know full well that the blanket they have wrapped around the system they are operating is non negotiable ,so if you do delve into their trap eventually u will be ripped off and theres fuck all you can do about it,my only advice is once bitten twice shy ,we all know theres better out there and most of it is free, hyping these girls up like they are superstars and its your privilege to pay to see them is the mist most dont see through,pervcam and the way the private shows are managed will eventually be seen for what it really is,a con ,

Well it certainly was a lesson learned. Needless to say i won't be putting my hand in my pocket again. As ive posted before ive previously been on perv and the girls seem more interested putting on a show for the mr p, not the guy paying.
I thought id give private a try and see if that was any different. Now i see this for what it really is, as quoted above nothing more than a con - all that the producers and performers are interested is the viewers money, nothing else, and they dont care how they get it.

(27-08-2018 14:13 )qwerty125 Wrote:  I've been toying with posting this for a while, and as it's a bit quiet in this thread at the moment...

So I've had this idea for a new 2 minute game. Drum roll please:

"The Suitcase of Surprise!"

The backstage staff put together a suitcase of interesting things. Clothes obviously - there's plenty of sexy garments we never see like babydolls, negligees, tight fitting sportswear etc. But there can be other stuff in the case as well to play with - though certain toys wouldn't be allowed on screen there could be suggestively shaped fruit for example, and other things like feather dusters, novelty handcuffs and so on. The crucial thing is that the girls don't know what's in the case beforehand.

I've just spotted a fatal flaw in your masterplan-LORI doesn't wear clothes.

Shower back again! Hopefully it's going to be a regular fixture.

I think i have finally seen the light with these channels (granted it took me a while).
There was a performer on at the weekend (who doesnt have the best reputation on here from what ive seen) who spent most of the day on chat box having discussions with some of her regular fans regarding twitter bans, being blocked and chat bans for quite some time. By the end of her shift though she was asking the same guys to ring her.
I sat and reflected a few hours later to think of what just happened then it dawned on me. The performer took these actions so that when the guys called her (which she knew they would) then the guys would have lots of questions about twitter bans, stuff on chat etc and therefore a longer phone call would equal more money in her pocket.
Some users on chat (me formerly included) believe the girls care about them and are genuine, thankfully i have now seen that this couldnt be further from the truth

(28-08-2018 04:33 )aaron Wrote:  Shower back again! Hopefully it's going to be a regular fixture.

Yes it was good to see it again: and on Babestation: the "Shower Channel"! I thought Lori was quite good BUT before she went in the shower (blurred at the start) at about 3.32am she replaced another girl in there (on Sky or the webshow!?) Could anyone confirm who it was please. She was quite tall and with dark hair. I was hoping that it wasn't Chloe that I had missed BUT hopefully I don't think the timings worked as she was on Babenation from 3.00 till 3.39 and Babecall from 4.03 till the end! Any clue at all anyone? Just intrigued. Thanks. I'm guessing Kayleigh?, Nikita? (more likely!?) or Maxie? as their timings might have worked? I'm just glad that HOPEFULLY it wasn't Chloe!...............
UPDATE: I've just re-watched that section and through the blur I think I could just about make out Maxie's tattoos on her arm! So it wasn't Chloe as I hoped and thought! Thanks.