Kiki Daniels - Babestation Nights - Chat & Discussion (Only)

Some observations from me :-

From the evidence it seems that Kiki should have returned the money

I find it strange that Kiki is so hard up that she cannot bare to part with the money. It would have saved her a lot of hassle if she did return the money. She should still do that and save some face.

I don't know why anyone would pay £ 100 for a video when you can go to a massage parlour for that money and have real sex.

(20-08-2018 17:02 )Joey 27 Wrote:  Im not defending her at all, but it always seems to be the lesser names who come in for this type of criticism i guess that's because they don't have many fans/fanboys to defend them, only Winsaw is defending Kiki as he is a bit of a fanboy of new girls

Had it been a forum favourite, eg Fernanda, Scarlett, Evelyn, Clare, Atlanta, Lola, Ashley, Alice who robbed my name sake. i just wonder how many people would care considering he has only made 29 posts in 10 years, no doubt it will soon be forgotten and they'd all still be in the running for their respective babe of the year awards

As wrong as it might be, most people don't really care if a babeshow girl mugs off some average Joeeeeee, pun intended,
i just think its hypocritical to single out the lesser names/marmite types who do this

Since when was post-count a measure of credibility and influence? If anything, there is a negative correlation, given the broadly inverse relationship between quality and quantity in such matters.

As for not caring about average punters getting mugged off, speak for yourself. I am average punter and I very much care about knowing who to trust in the industry. You come across as a narcissist who considers themselves an above average, even "superior" punter.

As for the absurd notion that "it always seems to be the lesser names who come in for this type of criticism.....hypocritical to single out the lesser names/marmite types who do this", well that has already been demolished by others on here.

Well at least one of those big name girls listed had been called out for scamming deposits on the back of alleged meets so they ain't squeaky clean either!!

One of the problems with publicising these sorts of things (due to careful policing by our beloved mods to make sure the board doesn't get shut) is that you need a bit of proof. Joeeeee came armed with that and Kiki's remonstrations to Winsaw don't look to hold any water; basically she just seemed to keep on digging a hole for herself in the hope we'd swallow it.

I think where some of the more established names (and the broader business world at large) prosper is because they understand a reputation is easily lost and, whilst not everyone reads this forum, this should hopefully put a dent in her earnings and make her think again how she does business.

(20-08-2018 17:02 )Joey 27 Wrote:  Had it been a forum favourite, eg Fernanda, Scarlett, Evelyn, Clare, Atlanta, Lola, Ashley, Alice who robbed my name sake. i just wonder how many people would care considering he has only made 29 posts in 10 years, no doubt it will soon be forgotten and they'd all still be in the running for their respective babe of the year awards

As wrong as it might be, most people don't really care if a babeshow girl mugs off some average Joeeeeee, pun intended,
i just think its hypocritical to single out the lesser names/marmite types who do this

^
Yeah hopefully now others will see her for what she is and I hope it does put a dent in her finances. Shouldn’t get away with what she’s done, absolute criminal

This was a specific complaint (with evidence) about the girl who's thread this is (which is why we haven't touched those posts), not a place for casting a wider net about those who may or may not have done the same thing and general bitching etc, so, with that being said, some posts have been moved into the TZ, as they aren't relevant to Joeeeeee's complaint.

Cheers for the info Joeeee

I like Kiki and if she were genuinely offering good B/G content then I'd have happily given her stacks of money. Now she wont be getting a penny.

In the long run nicking the odd £100 isn't really worth it if she wants a career in this industry.

^ Yeah it’s simple really actually provide good content and fans will happily pay to see it. She’s fucked it now for herself I think

(19-08-2018 14:20 )winsaw Wrote:  think there could be a bit of spin going on here, not all the messages have been shown, so i talked to Kiki about it as there are 2 sides to everything and here are some of the points she made,

she offered Joeeeeee a full refund after his first post on here he refused and said her didn't want the money,

he sent her abusive threatening messages which dont appear in the time line he has shown,

he told her that if she sent him the video he was going to upload it on to porn hub,

also he admitted to her that he is under 18 years old, at this point she told him he would not be getting the video as she not sending porn to kids,

so quite a different take on things and maybe not everything Joeeeeee said here should be taken as gospel,

Did you honestly expect her to tell you "yeah, I ripped him off"? Of course she was going to feed you a bunch of excuses!

Did you not even think about those excuses she was giving you? Why would someone pay £100 and then want to upload it for everyone else to see for free? Even if he was under 18 why would he tell her? Why would his age even come up? And why would he refuse a refund when it was clear he wasn't getting what he paid for?

I swear these girls could commit grievous homicide and there will be the fanboys white knighting and making excuses for them! It never ceases to amaze the lengths that some posters will go to on here in order to stick up for the girls, even when it's obvious that they're nothing more than scamming rip off merchants.

(19-08-2018 17:02 )Joeeeeee Wrote:  

(19-08-2018 16:56 )winsaw Wrote:  

(19-08-2018 16:06 )babefan2012 Wrote:  But if she did over a refund then the question remains, why refuse it?? Especially when it was evident he wasn’t getting what he paid for.

That's the bit I really don't get, I would think the hole reason for starting this little thread was to get his money back, and it worked, all he had to do was remove his comments on here after he got the money, but he's refused it, so it's seams to be more important to give her a bad reputation, which is hole different thing,

That’s the last message I had off her and that was after I’d made my first post simply asking if anyone has had problems with her customers before.

"Why would i send an intimate video of myself"...

The levels of irony are actually hilarious. Sometimes you wish people could just hear themselves.

This has been done to death now. If people want to take it further report her to the authorities and pursue legal action.