Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

Who's forgot what Paige did for one show on RLC web show she was showing her boob's all day under a sheer body if she can do it on there why can't she go topless for an hour at studio 66

http://babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=65406

(20-01-2016 11:37 )Bandwagon Wrote:  ^ I wouldn't say you've missed anything of any real significance William.

You may be right, but judging from the attention its gotten it must have been the event of the night at least.

^ Gratitude for small mercies.

(20-01-2016 11:36 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  ...most people watching will probably know it was a tease hour/show from following s66 on social media

You again judge by your own proclivities there I think Rammy. Social media is huge, yes. Social media use is growing, yes. Social media use by the babe shows is needed, of importance to the channels, and also growing, yes. But... you over-estimate its reach as of right now IMO.

"Most people" tuning into 66 I'm pretty certain couldn't give a tinker's cuss about 66's social media, would only have the vaguest idea that it existed and even if they did would never dream of looking at their twitter feed.

Babe channel social media is currently important to fans. Full stop. It gets us spending - very few others. It encourages the swelling of our ranks and maintains the interest of those already initiated but that is a small minority compared to the thousands that flick past the channels for the occasional perve.

Regardless, perhaps the more important point is your counter to Jimmy's argument. I have one question for you on this: Do you agree that by persisting with the tease/daytime extra slots 66 are watering down future expectation levels amongst their viewers/callers of what a night show should contain in terms of visuals?

^^^great points....post won't last long or maybe it's just when I say it.

i only caught the end but last night was one of the sexiest 241s of recent times. Mikki and Paige have genuine chemistry and i was suprised by how hands on they were. that could be in part due to my lower expectations given how tame 241s are nowadays

Same here, I thought it was sexy. A definite thumbs up from me.

(20-01-2016 11:59 )William H Bonney Wrote:  judging from the attention its gotten it must have been the event of the night at least.

It was the event of the night by some distance and fully deserves all the attention it's been getting. More of the same please.

(20-01-2016 13:02 )forumdude Wrote:  ^^^great points....post won't last long or maybe it's just when I say it.

Stop playing hard done by, you've only had a handful of posts removed and only two that involve Rammy, oh and they are in the TZ...so how about you give the poor me, evil mods routine a rest

(20-01-2016 12:57 )ShandyHand Wrote:  

(20-01-2016 11:36 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  ...most people watching will probably know it was a tease hour/show from following s66 on social media

You again judge by your own proclivities there I think Rammy. Social media is huge, yes. Social media use is growing, yes. Social media use by the babe shows is needed, of importance to the channels, and also growing, yes. But... you over-estimate its reach as of right now IMO.

"Most people" tuning into 66 I'm pretty certain couldn't give a tinker's cuss about 66's social media, would only have the vaguest idea that it existed and even if they did would never dream of looking at their twitter feed.

Babe channel social media is currently important to fans. Full stop. It gets us spending - very few others. It encourages the swelling of our ranks and maintains the interest of those already initiated but that is a small minority compared to the thousands that flick past the channels for the occasional perve.

Regardless, perhaps the more important point is your counter to Jimmy's argument. I have one question for you on this: Do you agree that by persisting with the tease/daytime extra slots 66 are watering down future expectation levels amongst their viewers/callers of what a night show should contain in terms of visuals?

can see your point but I don't really agree, because not everyone has the same expectations for what a nightshow should contain visually so cant say for definate if expectations will be lowered by s66 carrying on with tease shows/hours.