Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion

(25-11-2015 16:10 )Charlemagne Wrote:  ^^Rammy there's no way that you can portray 'rinsing' with a positive spin.
It may not be illegal but it's morally unacceptable.

I wasn't intending to portray rinsing in a positive light. i was just saying why i don't really have a problem with rinsing as it's not illegal for models to ask for gifts from people and no one is being forced to buy these gifts.

do think Loose Women should have had Lucy-Anne & her sisters on to put forward their side of things or at least got a statement from Lucy-Anne & her Sisters

I deleted a rant I was planing to post about this the other day, but seeing as this shite isn't going away...

As long as there are children going hungry in the world, there is no defending this greedy behaviour, it's certainly nothing to be proud of.
We aren't talking a box of chocolates, some flowers or a reasonably priced gift here (which is fine I suppose), we're talking about things worth hundreds or even thousands of pounds. How about instead of a wishlist that fleeces people that have more money than sense (I still can't wrap my head around this whole buying something expensive for a stranger thing), they stick up a list of good causes and charities for those idiots to give their money to instead, do some good for fucks sake people!!!

(The above is my opinion and not that of the forum team)

The girls are not breaking the law & not doing anything wrong.

If these men are sad enough to buy them stuff & only get a photo back then more fool them, they should try and get a life..

It's not black and white.

If they are rinsing rich and powerful blokes trying to buy sex, then good on the girls.
If they are rinsing lonely and vulnerable Walter Mitty characters, then shame on the girls for encouraging it.

Impossible to know who is who over the internet though.

Didn't some guy buy a Mercedes for Lucy Zara and not a bottom spec a class either.

Why wasn't that on the news.

I used to rate her highly as one of my favourite girls, then I paid her some money for some worn items that never turned up and now I don't have any time for her. She emails you back immediately when it's all business to be done, then once she has your money you never hear from her again. I genuinely think she is horrible person despite whatever facade she might show on the outside.

I'm seeing a lot of it chat about how this is ok because the guys have a choice in this, well imho it's not. These guys r still vulnerable. If it was old ladies getting conned out of money for a service they perceived to be value for money the country would be up in arms. I know specific promises are not made, but a hell of a lot is implied. I once overheard a conversation, a couple of years back, where a girl was guiding a obviously drunk guy on how to get to her wish list on Amazon. It was the last call I made to the girl.

(25-11-2015 16:05 )circles_o_o_o Wrote:  So it seems the sisters should have appeared on loose women but had their booking cancelled when their "porn background" came to light (that's what it says in the headline)

http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/75k-s...se-6896636

I wonder if Lucy cancelled due to it being available on tv for free,with no webcam option.

"We’re doing many of these men a favour"