Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion

Last night Bex was pleading for calls on both Sky TV and the streams
Bex was on Sky TV from 10.00pm to 11.00pm and again I think from 11.30 with her Domination show.
Bex is not my "cup of tea " and judging by comments about dom shows on other channels there are a lot of people who like myself do not like dom shows.
It would be more appropriate to put Bex`s Dom show on the streams from 10.00pm
You would have thought that Sin would put their "Big hitters" in terms of the volume of their calls received on Sky TV between the hours of 10pm and midnight or say 1.00am at the latest to maximize the number of calls before we go to bed as people have to go to work in the morning
That just makes good business sense to maximize their income
Last night the girl receiving the most calls was Dionne Mendez but she was hardly on Sky TV between 10pm and 1.00am
Surely the producer knows if a show on Sky TV between 10pm and 1.00am is not bringing in many calls so why does the producer not act quicker to change the show to see if that increases the volume of callers
You do not have to be an"Einstein " to work that out
Some of the girls put on good shows in the small hours of the morning which we record to watch later the next day as we are asleep when the shows are live. But that does not bring Sin TV any income whatsoever so they need to make better use of the 10.00pm to 1.00am time slot
Perhaps I should apply for a job at Sin TV as I am a retired accountant !!!!!

(11-05-2015 14:05 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  your going with me kerravon are you ill???

Don't worry Rammy, the drugs will wear off later so I'll be normal soon enough

(11-05-2015 10:17 )HEX!T Wrote:  streams:
i love the idea of girls doing more on the streams but if the girls arent present they arent gonna get calls, are they?...

in reality if they want the streams to be a success then there gonna have to take the hit and put the girls on full shifts doing 1-2 hour sessions with a 15 min break for the whole night. anything less is just a pointless effort. added to that, im starting to think there getting paranoid about the amount of people watching but not calling, so are cutting sessions short to stop in there eyes "freeloading"...

i agree with this, i would go further thought and say that they need to follow the RLC model of having 1 girl on a set stream all night,
it's the only why there will get usage of the streams up as at the moment people are waiting for their fave girl to be on tv as they have know idea when she will be on the web,
if for example last night there was a schedule that said Bex on tv, Jade on xstream 1 & Dionne on xstream 2 all night then people would know where to go and and the xstream would start making money,
they would need to stick with it as the awareness goes up but in the long run it would bring a better viewing experience and more revenue across all there platforms,
also think they should star making use of the xstream in the day with a daytime xtra type show

They should have someone to work the tv and the streams all night but rotate them so we get to see them what ever format we watch and they get to do something different.

As for the X-Streams, there is not even a U-Stream right now. Break time already ?

Sin TV is either struggling and having to resort to breaking rules, or the people running it are stupid and don't know they are breaking rules .

I've been having a look at their Twitter account that they are advertising on TV both day and night . It looks to me like they are definitely breaking the rules, and could end up in big trouble, there's definitely links and R18 images visible when visiting their twitter account, you only have to look who they are following to be confronted by porn stars both male and female in hard core imagery, this twitter account is being shown in the bloody day, visiting it leads to hard core material, Ofcom could well end up throwing the bloody book at them imo.

What i can't understand is why the posts on here mentioning them advertising their twitter on tv were removed for a while and then brought back again ?, has someone checked to see if they were breaking the rules and decided they weren't ?, because there is now way that i can see that they are not breaking the rules in doing so .
If they carry on giving links were hard core imagery can be viewed, it's going to end in tears if you ask me, if they are unaware that they are breaking (in my view) the rules then someone need to inform them .

I guess their fall from grace is going to be very hard me thinks....

(11-05-2015 15:56 )mr mystery Wrote:  Sin TV is either struggling and having to resort to breaking rules, or the people running it are stupid and don't know they are breaking rules .

I've been having a look at their Twitter account that they are advertising on TV both day and night . It looks to me like they are definitely breaking the rules, and could end up in big trouble, there's definitely links and R18 images visible when visiting their twitter account, you only have to look who they are following to be confronted by porn stars both male and female in hard core imagery, this twitter account is being shown in the bloody day, visiting it leads to hard core material, Ofcom could well end up throwing the bloody book at them imo.

What i can't understand is why the posts on here mentioning them advertising their twitter on tv were removed for a while and then brought back again ?, has someone checked to see if they were breaking the rules and decided they weren't ?, because there is now way that i can see that they are not breaking the rules in doing so .
If they carry on giving links were hard core imagery can be viewed, it's going to end in tears if you ask me, if they are unaware that they are breaking (in my view) the rules then someone need to inform them .

What rule would they be (possibly) breaking?

^
Probably this one
"Under rule 3.30 Ofcom licensed services that are broadcast without mandatory restricted access must not promote websites or products such as video content or images, that contain material within the recognised character of pornography"

These are the rules/guidelines that the babe channels have to abide by, including the advertisement of website rules for nights (page/section 8,and days section/page 9)
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binarie...idance.pdf

Is the argument not that the web site they are promoting is family safe Twitter, which is not a problem if you go by the letter of how ofcoms rule is worded