Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

Some of you get yourself tied up in knots defending everything this channel does you can't see when they are just taking the piss. Learn to enjoy the girls not the name of the channel and drop this stupid call stats nonsense. As viwers its not our concern how many calls someone gets or how many times rammy hits 're-dial on a Claire Richards show.

(20-02-2015 20:34 )ShandyHand Wrote:  No doubt 66 see the changes they are making as a spirited defence of their business. And one which, based on the very scant evidence we have, would seem to be working (for now at least). (SB and winsaw rightly point out the difficulty in relying on what we see on-screen as true evidence of what money is being made by 66 during these shifts.)

The way to judge is to go by whether things are repeated or not. Losses are cut quickly in the babe show world these days - look at Euro Babes for example and how long that lasted. As another example, it's fair to assume when Evelyn appeared a second time, so soon after her first appearance, that the first appearance must have been successful. That's the reality in the harsh babe show market.

I still think s66 isn't as bad as some forum members say it is, especially when it has the likes of Kandi Kay, Sophia Lares, Kara De La Hoyde and Victoria Roberts on their roster along with some good recent additions like Kourtney, Candy and Roxanne Leigha.

Yes losing clare richards is a huge blow for s66, but it isn't the first time they've lost a top babe and won't be the last

(21-02-2015 12:00 )BarrieBF Wrote:  The way to judge is to go by whether things are repeated or not. Losses are cut quickly in the babe show world these days - look at Euro Babes for example and how long that lasted. As another example, it's fair to assume when Evelyn appeared a second time, so soon after her first appearance, that the first appearance must have been successful. That's the reality in the harsh babe show market.

And look at Harry Amelia getting the chop as soon as she doesn't meet her call minutes target. As you say, that's the reality in the harsh babe show market.

All the channels need a good kick up the shit box Rammy
But then we have the fashion shows just to rub the salt right down to the bone.

But hey we're all over the fucking moon with that so let's just keep promoting it

(21-02-2015 05:21 )DeadPanStan Wrote:  

(18-02-2015 07:52 )Davy Crockett Wrote:  You might be right. Nobody's done dom as well as Bang Babes used to with their regular Domination Nights.

which ones were those?

He's talking about the Dannii Harwood and Lucy Zara shows. They were the stuff of legend.

Did Lucy Anne show a glimpse of tit last night? Did anyone really care? Come on boys and get raunchy, she said, with the conviction of a "Songs of Praise" announcer. Emma Butts looked like she was struggling to keep to the soft shows that are what Studio 66 are about now Emma is wasted on this channel Caught Emma a few times giving Ella that "how do you get away doing that crap" look. Studio have gone from top to bottom of the pile trouble is they dont seem to realise it

(21-02-2015 12:38 )Count Spankula Wrote:  He's talking about the Dannii Harwood and Lucy Zara shows. They were the stuff of legend.

Yes I was referring to the Zarwood shows!

(21-02-2015 13:06 )DeadPanStan Wrote:  Last night stuck on Bs realised not a single natural girl...so if you like that cool good for you, but what if it doesn't do it for you?

watch and phone xpanded

in seriousness though i do agree that girls like Lucy Anne will always get a lot of calls just based on their look with out having to do much, although i still think she will have her boobs out by the end of the year,

Soft core is the worst direction a channel can take well done s66 you are now anti the industry you bleed money out of people. Your standards have sunk to a new level we all ready only have a night show from 10pm to 5 am you now want to suck up to Ofcom so much you want day time at night. Just close down and let someone else have a go.