Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

I really wish the producers would let Mica and Jenn have a 2-4-1 tonight, or at least be on the same set together, nude maybe!

Have they ever shared the screen before?

(22-04-2014 21:05 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  Not bad I think. Couldn't tell it was cara on the camera until it switched to another camera to reveal it was cara some good chemistry between cara and tashie it looked like to me

Well they are bound to get on as they both share a dislike for the freeloader/potential customer,maybe babes filming others is something they should do more if it does not break any rules the babe behind the could even film topless when the babe onscreen is permitted to.

does putting the logo up, slightly after something the producer doesn't like has happened, not just serve as a marker for some busy body to report it? As the thing they didn't want to show has already happened anyway.

Yeah, they're kind of giving themselves away when they do that. I tend to think they put it up just to give the impression that they are still keeping an eye on things. The worst is when they tell the women that they've had a slip, while focusing on their reactions to the news, which then further draws attention to the whole thing. Silliness

(23-04-2014 23:38 )RatedR Wrote:  does putting the logo up, slightly after something the producer doesn't like has happened, not just serve as a marker for some busy body to report it? As the thing they didn't want to show has already happened anyway.

stupid right if they use logo to cover up it means they showed something they should not, better off panning away or to their face

I worry it started because of discussions with Ofcom about how s66 is 'doing all it can to assure compliance' to try and get in their good books. But it's so blatant. When the 'casual viewer/grass' wouldn't noitice the infringement normally. And I am sure such viewers exist, because people love to feel important and powerful. Didn't some channel have a war with BS, simply because it was near it on the listings and they thought it was corrupting.

(23-04-2014 23:38 )RatedR Wrote:  does putting the logo up, slightly after something the producer doesn't like has happened, not just serve as a marker for some busy body to report it?

Maybe, but doesn't half come in handy for fast forwarding through recordings!
Up comes the logo - "can I get a reeewind"
Many thanks to STD66 for bookmarking the best bits

(23-04-2014 23:55 )RatedR Wrote:  I worry it started because of discussions with Ofcom about how s66 is 'doing all it can to assure compliance' to try and get in their good books. But it's so blatant. When the 'casual viewer/grass' wouldn't noitice the infringement normally. And I am sure such viewers exist, because people love to feel important and powerful. Didn't some channel have a war with BS, simply because it was near it on the listings and they thought it was corrupting.

No there was a complaint about partyland on freeview few years back was right next to Ceebebies thats when they moved all the channels up the Freeview to there own section

think some dad "accidently" switched from Cebeebies to Ceboobies think was daryl morgan on at the time

(25-04-2014 05:51 )HannahsPet Wrote:  ...

think some dad "accidently" switched from Cebeebies to Ceboobies think was daryl morgan on at the time

ceboobies that reminded me of a mock the week scenes we'd like to see where hugh dennis went "I just turned on to your new porn channel.....ceboobies " when the topic was unlikely letters to the bbc

What a huge gaffe by Freeview.