(22-01-2014 14:39 )Signboy Wrote: I've only seen Gina 4 or 5 times on her BScam and she appears to be a Lori II, If she doesn't show anything on her private cam i can't see her showing more on pervcam, Hopefully I'm wrong but she won't be getting anymore of my credits.
Not so sure I agree there.
I did check her out on bs+ a couple of weeks back and she did a awesome show over there so I think she will do a great pervcam as long as Lori isn't in charge of the camera settings.
But I think Lori is doing pervcam great if it wasn't for the terrible quality.
(23-01-2014 12:57 )Tintin Wrote: I had a look at Lori's pervcam 3 times last night & twice was nothing but a black screen & when the cam was on the picture quality was crap...
Yeah, Lori's pervcam is dead as we knew it from the old days. I still think that Lori is doing great pervcam shows but now it's all about getting away with the lowest quality settings and still hope she get some people spending money on her pervcam. I won't be one of them until she/bs deliver some decent quality feed. It's not that the video is small but the quality is horrible. Out of focus and glowing because the camera lens part is dirty (To much fingers marks on it?
), pixelerated and most of the time colorless because of the low quality settings.
Also the webdesign is made for 16:9 aspect ratios video but all webcam from the bs studio is sent in 4:3 so it looks extra small.
Really sad in the end since I did look really forward to the pervcam's after Ben did buy new webcams. But instead we ended up with the same or even worse quality then we had befor on the old cams and now allmost none of the girls doing pervcam. And I'm pretty sure it's all because of the complaints about the quality and the blackscreen problems.
If a few girls doing bad performance it's not a problem. You just don't go and watch them. But it's a problem that when 1 girl change the settings on the laptop in the studio it effects all the girls who use the laptop after her unless someone change the quality back to "good". And that really sucks.
1 example.
Jada's pervcam (Awesome HD quality)
Babestation+ (Awesome HD quality)
Lori Pervcam (Settings changed to Low quality)
Babestation+ (In low quality after Lori change settings and stayed that way until someone change the settings back, AND it's WONT be done by Lori who changed them in the first place)
What it takes is that 1 guy took the 1-2 min. of his time to clean and setup the webcam for some decent hd quality each night then I'm pretty sure they would earn ALOT more money of pervcams,webshows and bs+.
But I guess it's just easier to just not do any shows.......