Sophia Knight "Ultimate Nightshow Babe 2011" - Chat & Discussion

(17-05-2012 09:10 )Rise Wrote:  

(17-05-2012 05:12 )unparalleled Wrote:  and he's 'bored' of it

Probability - 'nae feckin' way' %

(17-05-2012 05:12 )unparalleled Wrote:  Just like any GF you might be happy the first few times but after months/years it becomes nothing special

big fat yes

edit - to whoever is editing my quote. STOP IT.

(17-05-2012 00:16 )iloveMegan Wrote:  If anyone doesn't want her to do it, why not just not avoid watching the scene if she does do it?

there you go talking "common sense" again

Sadly i think some people/fanboys dont like the idea that Sophia is getting fucked at all let alone on film....

^^^ and im giving my opinion on what I think about certain comments that have been made in this thread...

I dont actually remember mentioning you specifically,,,

Jesus, serious sense of humour bypass ...



.....Feller!!!!???

^^^ and as i never mentioned you specifically why have you taken my "fanboy jibe" personally?

B/G porn will cheapen her more than G/G will. If she does it more than once and with different people, then her luster will fade.

(18-05-2012 00:12 )mrmann Wrote:  B/G porn will cheapen her more than G/G will.

How so?

(18-05-2012 00:17 )iloveMegan Wrote:  

(18-05-2012 00:12 )mrmann Wrote:  B/G porn will cheapen her more than G/G will.

How so?

For me, it's a visual thing really, and I think there's less of a stigma with women having been with other women on screen. However, when it comes to men, the idea of her getting a facial from multiple men, and shafted by multiple men in many different videos doesn't appeal to me. Also, could anyone truly call her a slut in the typical term, if she's mostly been on screen with women? I don't think so, but if she's shot porn with many different men, then that will quickly give her the slut stamp. Doesn't matter if it's her job, she's still getting thrusted by different men on screen.

I think she'd be smarter to do one or two scenes at most, but with her boyfriend. No more than that.

(18-05-2012 00:23 )mrmann Wrote:  I think there's less of a stigma with women having been with other women on screen.

Why? What's the difference?

(18-05-2012 00:23 )mrmann Wrote:  However, when it comes to men, the idea of her getting a facial from multiple men, and shafted by multiple men in many different videos doesn't appeal to me.

Don't watch it then (if it happens).

(18-05-2012 00:23 )mrmann Wrote:  Also, could anyone truly call her a slut in the typical term, if she's mostly been on screen with women? I don't think so, but if she's shot porn with many different men, then that will quickly give her the slut stamp.

Will it? The majority of female pornstars have shot scenes with many different male talents, do you consider all of those girls to be "sluts"?

(18-05-2012 00:31 )iloveMegan Wrote:  

(18-05-2012 00:23 )mrmann Wrote:  Also, could anyone truly call her a slut in the typical term, if she's mostly been on screen with women? I don't think so, but if she's shot porn with many different men, then that will quickly give her the slut stamp.

Will it? The majority of female pornstars have shot scenes with many different male talents, do you consider all of those girls to be "sluts"?

Umm, yes, I do consider them to be sluts. Isn't that common sense??? You shag for cash with many people, be it on or off screen = slut. Sorry to inform you. Maybe I have a different view than you do.

I already gave examples in my above post.

(18-05-2012 00:34 )mrmann Wrote:  Umm, yes, I do consider them to be sluts. Isn't that common sense??? You shag for cash with many people, be it on or off screen = slut. Sorry to inform you. Maybe I have a different view than you do.

I already gave examples in my above post.

So why wouldn't she be a 'slut' if she fucks women on camera ? Double standards much ?