Legends of babe Chanels 2015

1 DARYL MORGAN
2 CANDY CHARMS
3 LOLLY BADCOCK
4 AMANDA RENDALL
5 DANNI HARWOOD
6 FERNANDA FERARRI
7 KANDI KAY
8 TIFFANY CHAMBERS

Daryl Morgan
Georgie Darby
Camilla Jayne
Amanda Rendall
Dannii Harwood
Jennifer Jade
Kandi Kay
Tiffany Chambers

DARYL MORGAN
GEORGIE DARBY
LOLLY BADCOCK
PAIGE TYLER
DANI O’ NEAL
FERNANDA FERARRI
KANDI KAY
TIFFANY CHAMBERS

Just a query in case this scenario ever presents itself.
What happens if a match is tied and the number of nominations is also tied?

A fresh score update: -

1 KARINA CURRIE 7 - 24 DARYL MORGAN
2 CANDY CHARMS 7 - 24 GEORGIE DARBY
3 LOLLY BADCOCK 16 - 19 CAMILLA JAYNE
4 AMANDA RENDALL 24 - 8 PAIGE TYLER
5 DANNII HARWOOD 19 - 14 DANI O’ NEAL
6 FERNANDA FERARRI 17 - 16 JENNIFER JADE
7 MORGAN PREECE 10 - 23 KANDI KAY
8 LUCY ZARA 11 - 19 TIFFANY CHAMBERS

(21-11-2015 17:51 )snookered147 Wrote:  Just a query in case this scenario ever presents itself.
What happens if a match is tied and the number of nominations is also tied?

Haven't thought of that yet snookered what do you suggest?

(21-11-2015 18:26 )babelover48 Wrote:  

(21-11-2015 17:51 )snookered147 Wrote:  Just a query in case this scenario ever presents itself.
What happens if a match is tied and the number of nominations is also tied?

Haven't thought of that yet snookered what do you suggest?

Naked jelly wrestling between the 2 tied contestants should settle things

Karina Currie
Georgie Darby
Camilla Jayne
Amanda Rendall
Dani O'neal
Fernanda Ferrari
Kandi Kay
Tiffany Chambers

(21-11-2015 18:26 )babelover48 Wrote:  

(21-11-2015 17:51 )snookered147 Wrote:  Just a query in case this scenario ever presents itself.
What happens if a match is tied and the number of nominations is also tied?

Haven't thought of that yet snookered what do you suggest?

Tricky because there is no countback rule you can apply in this particular round if the scenario applies in this round (by the way I don't know if it does or not as I have not counted the number of nominations for each babe).
You could give yourself as organiser the casting vote but this might be deemed as unfair.
You could toss a coin but this would be possibly deemed as unfair as well as not independently verified.
The other thing you could do is put both babes into matches against the next opponent.
If both lose against the next opponent problem solved.
If one wins and one loses against the next opponent then problem solved
If both win against the next opponent but one wins by a bigger margin than the other then problem solved. The one with the bigger winning margin progresses.

However........ if both beat their next opponent by exactly the same margin then you are back to square one.
You would just have to hope and pray that did not happen .
Of course there is one other scenario to bear in mind.
If there is a tie on all counts in a round AFTER this one then there is a countback mechanism you could use.
Look at the winning margins in the previous round or rounds.
Whichever babe has the better tournament points difference could progress or win in the case of the final.
If you are confused then say so and I will pm you.

^ I had to read that three times before it made sense.

Do you work for HMRC ?