Lola Knight - (Ultimate Babe 2018 & 2019) - Chat & Discussion (Only)

(20-01-2020 01:56 )GMach1 Wrote:  I think you're right Snooks old pal, I love Lola a lot but I would hate to think she is anyway involved in ripping people off.

Nah not Lola, S66 yes definitely, but Lola is very receptive to punters ideas. She has already changed the second tip goal as she reads the chat and she probably saw that their isn't much appetite for light BDSM.

I'm sure any suggestions she reads or hears she will take on board, but I doubt very much she would intentionally engage in ripping people off. I haven't seen anything from her to suggest she is that way inclined in 4 plus years on the channels.

Obviously I could be wrong but ripping people off seems more like a S66 move than a Lola move

Yes I very much suspect it is S66 and NOT Lola

Sensual striptease tip goal up now.
She is an expert at those anyway.

The BDSM one flopped big time.
Now come on S66 play fair.
Give us full body shot and open leg once the goal is hit for the duration.

Yeah right.
And Lord Lucan to win the FA Cup

(20-01-2020 02:15 )snookered Wrote:  Sensual striptease tip goal up now.
She is an expert at those anyway.

The BDSM one flopped big time.
Now come on S66 play fair.
Give us full body shot and open leg once the goal is hit for the duration.

Yeah right.
And Lord Lucan to win the FA Cup

If you suggest that to Lola in her chat I say she would be game for it Snookered. You could even suggest to her that after say 10 minutes of doing the striptease she could go on the mic and say she will keep it going for as long as she is getting callers and people keep tipping a bit, incentivising the continuation of the tip goal.

S66 would overrule.
Striptease tip goal has disappeared.
Another flop.

At least make the tip goal interesting S66

But I have raised the pole dance idea on the chat for what it's worth

I think she was trying to be different to what she did for for last goal. If it was exactly the same then people would get bored very quickly, as can be seen on BS if the presenter does exactly the same thing when their tip goal is reached again and again. Plus she seemed to come back from her break specifically to carry out the tip goal and not leave people 'hanging' as it were. I think it's a good sign that Lola unrestricted wont mean the same thing every time the goal is put forward and reached.

Eating dry toast not erotic, but rubbing it on your body with honey or jam or letting butter drip down you...now THAT's erotic!

(20-01-2020 02:29 )snookered Wrote:  S66 would overrule.
Striptease tip goal has disappeared.
Another flop.

At least make the tip goal interesting S66

Yeah you're right they might overrule, that's why I suggested saying it to Lola directly, going straight to the babe in question is the only way of making S66 cop on, they have no clue what the punters want, especially judging by what they said at the introduction of tip goals, "all tip goals are for perv cam", they are hopeless.

Also I think Lola chooses herself what the tip goals are, what gets shown from said tip goal is decided by whichever clown is running the show on that specific night. I feel there was a different person in charge Thursday when Lola did her epic stint. Could be wrong but it has always felt like this going back months and years. one night the women on tv would have a lot of freedom, decent camera work, then the next night with the same women is no movement and head shot only, then back again

All that aside it's been a very enjoyable show from Lola tonight, lots of bj simulation, some (not enough) pussy on show for the web (with toast thong ), taking up lots of different positions, rarely static for too long, 2 good outfits and lots of bending over showing off her peachy bum.

Babe of the night performance from Lola last night both tv & on the web, more of the same on Thursday please Lola

This thread continues to be the fascinating read of those concerning the 66 shows atm. Keep up the good work in documenting this stuff lads, it's appreciated.

(20-01-2020 02:11 )snookered Wrote:  Yes I very much suspect it is S66 and NOT Lola

This does seem the most likely background for what you guys saw last night. Some boss (or two) didn't like the implications of what Lola had slipped into doing these things. Why else overule the babe's (as Steemw confirmed earlier, now weeks' long) established and clear inclination to do her goals 'fta'? As ever, there seems the implication that things get (peevishly?) corrected back to company policy at 66 only after a show makes a little splash of publicity on this forum! Winsaw appears right on the 66 thread: It takes some insiders a long time to admit things have moved on.

Hopefully Lola's latest thong artifact - toast! - will soon be proved as a metaphor for some bts' overly protectionist thinking here.

(20-01-2020 02:40 )Stemmw Wrote:  ... decided by whichever clown is running the show on that specific night. I feel there was a different person in charge Thursday when Lola did her epic stint. Could be wrong but it has always felt like this going back months and years. one night the women on tv would have a lot of freedom, decent camera work, then the next night with the same women is no movement and head shot only, then back again ...

Also bang on IMO. I've long sensed the same based on what we see onscreen from the same babes on consecutive shifts (even sometimes ones on the same day a week later). And it is indeed most noticable (because the crew have more input) on nights. 

It is only realistic to assume some crews have more creativity, greater independent thought, than others. They are more confident to go with a vibe of a progressive, sparking show - to let it take it's natural course; more inclined to give the babe her head if things feel right in the moment, etc. They are more likely to trust the babe knows what she is doing. In other words they may well look to get the right results even if it means rubbing against the boring standard m.o. 

Lesser crews, otoh, would be more likely to just stick to what they've been told works best most often (the denial of properly erotic visuals inspiring greater cam use mainly). They stick to this rule no matter what might be instinctual to the babe or what might occur unexpectedly on the night. This type crew member tends to doubt the babe, thinking she will run into trouble for showing too much and so pull her back to play safe. They have no real feeling for the punter or what works on a show, they just produce by rote. Directing things in this fashion these crews are far more likely to churn out the duller, deader, shows from the punters pov. The babes just don't stand as much chance of getting the same quality through.