Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion

(16-05-2012 17:20 )Broncobilly Wrote:  I agree the production team are a large part of it, the rota is fine something for everyone some like playboy bunny's some don't. But the regulations make it harder for everyone to relax things seem more stiff than before.

For me the Rota is at times part of the problem , some nights on RLC there is not something for everyone , you only have to go back and check previous posts made in this thread to see posts made by various people and the thanks they get when mentioning the nights poor line up and lack of variety , RLC/Playboy have got a great selection of girls that do offer something for everyone , but at times they have girls on the same night that are similar to each other and do the same sort of performance , so you don't get much in the terms of providing variety or giving something for everyone . In fact the freeview channel is even worse , the freeviewers get the same few girls night after night with very little variety .

The freeview channel is run by playboy they want the bunny type.

I agree the way things are at this moment in time are a lot harder since the heady days of 2006-2010 however the producers not only for Redlight but for all channels needs to step up and raise to the challenges which are set before them. Brooks show as SB said was a perfect example of that, there was a producer willing to push the limits keeping to the right side of the rules, and the results was a great show.

(16-05-2012 17:59 )Broncobilly Wrote:  The freeview channel is run by playboy they want the bunny type.

Yes apparently that is true , but this policy seems to be pissing off the freeviewers , maybe they need to employ more of the bunny type to give a greater variation of girls even if they are similar in looks , or even ditch this "bunny type" idea in order to give a bit more variation to cater for differing tastes . See the posts below made in the freeview thread to see what i'm talking about concerning peoples thoughts about the lack of variety and not having something for everyone ..

(16-05-2012 00:09 )The Robot Devil Wrote:  I don't fucking believe this. Ava is on again !!! Stone the f'n crows. Goodnight RLC.

(16-05-2012 00:17 )bluemoon99 Wrote:  

(16-05-2012 00:09 )The Robot Devil Wrote:  I don't fucking believe this. Ava is on again !!! Stone the f'n crows. Goodnight RLC.

Too right, Yawnsville, Arizona - could you get a more unreal pair of titties? Two nights on the run is taking the Michael.I'm calling it a draw & am off to bed - let's hope for something better tomorrow.

(16-05-2012 07:56 )vila Wrote:  I have to take back the favourable comments I made when I first started watching after Kandi and Ella defected from BS.

Aside from occasional appearances by those two it's just the same two or three mediocre girls, night after night, after night, after night, after night, after night.

For gawd's sake RLC, let's have some variety (and more quality, all-natural girls).

(16-05-2012 11:57 )TheWatcher Wrote:  Considering the large number of different girls available, it seems strange that not only do they just have the same girl on for most of the show's 5½ hour transmission time, but also do not use a wider range of their girls for ch99.
More variety is definitely needed, for each night, and on different nights.

I'd love to see a ban on stockings.

More great show's from Redlight/playboy last night, Lucy Zara was on top form as always, and with Jennifer jade, Tori lee, and Lolly Catherine on the other channels, I thought it was a great night

According to the schedules there is a Ree Petra and Ruby Summers 2 4 1 that should be good

(17-05-2012 13:37 )dan g 27 Wrote:  According to the schedules there is a Ree Petra and Ruby Summers 2 4 1 that should be good

Is that for tonight Dan?

(17-05-2012 14:49 )continental19 Wrote:  Is that for tonight Dan?

No tomorrow

(17-05-2012 15:45 )dan g 27 Wrote:  No tomorrow

Ah right, thanks for the heads up mate