Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

(30-05-2023 23:35 )SecretAgent Wrote:  ^ Last time you joked about that we ended up with pages of bollocks on this thread about S66 and Expanded!

I'm curious now if you think BS have anything to learn from what has happened to other operators over the years?

^ I’m quite certain that this thread is not where they would learn anything from the random repetitive musings of people about other channels. If people want to have those conversations I think they would be better off elsewhere especially when Rammy was joking!

(30-05-2023 16:59 )BarrieBF Wrote:  I think KerrAvon is right up to a point. Without much competition there is simply no incentive to improve the quality of services on offer. However, Babestation is more of a camsite now than a TV channel, so I would have thought they do have to try and compete with other camsites.

I quite agree, the camsite nature of BS is now just as major part of its operations.

But are they actually competing with other camsites? They simply 'use' the successful camsite template but still twist it to their own (and often not honest) ends. Perv cam and tips goals flow freely between TV and web. It's a strange one with BS, who still must be spending quite a bit maintaining their SKY and Freeview channels. It's in a unique hybrid state of its own (Xpanded too in a limited fashion). I don't think they worry about other camsites at all.

I think they'd be more worried about another babechannel starting TV operations. And I wish another babechannel would (however unlikely now).

(30-05-2023 23:35 )SecretAgent Wrote:  ^ Last time you joked about that we ended up with pages of bollocks on this thread about S66 and Expanded!

Wasn't my fault

Definitely were technical issues last night as no nightbabes appeared until around 11pm on sky, then 905 went off air completely for an hour at midnight

(31-05-2023 10:31 )SecretAgent Wrote:  ^ I’m quite certain that this thread is not where they would learn anything from the random repetitive musings of people about other channels. If people want to have those conversations I think they would be better off elsewhere especially when Rammy was joking!

It was not my intent to suggest they learn from here. Foolish to think they would do that via anything on the forum I agree. I was saying the discussion of what we think they should be thinking about is a legitimate one. More than that I was genuinely keen to hear your opinions on the subject given your knowledge of this operator.

You appear quite content with your experience of the channels even now. Is that a correct assessment?

Shandy my point just to be clear was that rantings about other channels is best in their threads where tbh it has been recounted numerous times. I remain of the belief that most of the comments were taking this thread off point.

From my own personal experience of the Babestation currently I can only say that I'm not experiencing any difficulties from a technology perspective or in terms of value but then a limit my interactions to one very reliable consistent performer

(31-05-2023 12:25 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  

(30-05-2023 23:35 )SecretAgent Wrote:  ^ Last time you joked about that we ended up with pages of bollocks on this thread about S66 and Expanded!

Wasn't my fault

Definitely were technical issues last night as no nightbabes appeared until around 11pm on sky, then 905 went off air completely for an hour at midnight

That's interesting as Fv 673 didn't start until 12.23 BUT after that BOTH channels were fine and 674 started as usual at midnight!.

Feels like a (very welcome) blast from the past type night tonight, with Olivia and Lori strutting their stuff..along with Beth, Sophie and Priya as well!

Some things and people are best left in the past.. whilst others such as Georgie Darby are eternal....

^ Indeed, I forgot that three of the women listed in post 28120 are in my Twitter header..