Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

So, last night we had Kandi Kay, Ella Jolie & Stella Cox, and it was still rubbish!

How in the hell can you manage to come up with crap when you have such babes at your disposal?

^ Easy.

Ella is wood
Kandi is mostly wood with the rare good session
Stella is 95% of the time very boring and rarely goes nude

For all those who night after night deride the quality of Studio 66, do what i do. Watch the occassional tease hour, you get the guarantee of a solo girl who usually puts the effort in. Then switch off when the boring two girls sharing a set starts. I get way more sleep and no longer feel the need to complain about how a once great channel is now utter tripe.

If three babes are going to be on each night I suggest a rotation policy to give all babes equal airtime with reasonable breaks in between stints. Maybe something like this.
* please note I may have totally ballsed this up but it was a bit of a rushed job . Doh .
But hopefully you see my point even if it is a complete load of tripe .

Babes A, B, C
912: 10-12=A 12-1=B 1-2.30=C 2.30-4=A 4-5.30=B
941: 10-11=B 11-12.30=C 12.30-2=A 2-3.30=B 3.30-5.30=C

I agree rotating would be a good idea. One problem seems to be that certain girls e.g. Jennifer never (or hardly ever) do a double show. This restricts S66's options even assuming they want to rotate. Not sure why this is the case- something in her contract or do certain girls not get on?

I too like the idea of rotating the girls to provide quality solo time but it does beg the question, why doesn't S66 seem to share the same view instead of whacking all the girls on at once? The only reasonable answer is because what they're doing is working
Somebody, somewhere, is happy to spend £180p/m with a £2 connection fee on what is essentially only half a show

We clearly need them to try the rotation policy to compare results

(02-10-2015 23:16 )Bandwagon Wrote:  I too like the idea of rotating the girls to provide quality solo time but it does beg the question, why doesn't S66 seem to share the same view instead of whacking all the girls on at once? The only reasonable answer is because what they're doing is working
Somebody, somewhere, is happy to spend £180p/m with a £2 connection fee on what is essentially only half a show

Yep, £180 p/m is what they'll be charging soon! And for the dubious pleasure of hearing another conversation going on a few inches away.
Seriously I don't think what they're doing even makes economic sense. When the solo girl goes on a break rather than switching one of the other girls across and at least getting some revenue they leave the screen blank and the other two girls together.

(01-10-2015 15:45 )mrmann Wrote:  ^ Easy.

Ella is wood
Kandi is mostly wood with the rare good session
Stella is 95% of the time very boring and rarely goes nude

Totally agree.
Kandi was a breath of fresh air when she first appeared on S66 but, for whatever reason, she appears to have lost her spark and seems to be just going through the motions. Can't remember the last of the good sessions you refer to but she's becoming as boring as she was on RLC.
This seems to be a recurring theme though. Perhaps babes start with lots of enthusiasm but soon get ground down by the channel and eventually get stuck in the rut of just doing as little as possible to earn their money.

(02-10-2015 23:16 )Bandwagon Wrote:  I too like the idea of rotating the girls to provide quality solo time but it does beg the question, why doesn't S66 seem to share the same view instead of whacking all the girls on at once? The only reasonable answer is because what they're doing is working
Somebody, somewhere, is happy to spend £180p/m with a £2 connection fee on what is essentially only half a show

I also think s66 should do rotation and give all the babes on plenty of solo time