Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 41 Vote(s) - 2.32 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Kerrie Lee - Studio66 - Chat & Discussion (Only)

Author Message
mrmann Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 15,880
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 92
Post: #1041
RE: Kerrie Lee - Chat & Discusion
^ Exactly, already being more censored than Fernanda! So lame. She's definitely being restricted. Really hope she goes to Babestation.
(This post was last modified: 18-01-2016 01:23 by mrmann.)
18-01-2016 01:21
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rammyrascal Offline
Team Thicc
*****

Posts: 100,176
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 249
Post: #1042
RE: Kerrie Lee - Chat & Discusion
^^
must have a producer tonight who clearly doesn't like babes going naked a lot Sad or is scared of ofcom

YOU STUPID BOOT!!!!
(This post was last modified: 18-01-2016 01:23 by Rammyrascal.)
18-01-2016 01:21
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Snooks Away
Where's the cue ball going?
*****

Posts: 51,984
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 280
Post: #1043
RE: Kerrie Lee - Chat & Discusion
No consistency whatsoever.
Farcical Rolleyes.

18-01-2016 01:22
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rammyrascal Offline
Team Thicc
*****

Posts: 100,176
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 249
Post: #1044
RE: Kerrie Lee - Chat & Discusion
for once I do agree, got to have consistency with how the babeshow rules are interpreted. Fernanda's producer last night clearly has interpreted the rules differently compared to Kerrie-Lee's producer tonight

even so think so far it's been a very good show from Kerrie-Lee tonight with oil & nudity

YOU STUPID BOOT!!!!
18-01-2016 01:30
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ShandyHand Offline
No Paywall Onlys - not babeshows
*****

Posts: 3,973
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 65
Post: #1045
RE: Kerrie Lee - Chat & Discusion
^ I agree with that. Even though the stupid thing is it MIGHT even be the same guy.
Seems to me we can't say on even that these days. Inconsistency can come from several reasons.

The idea that the babeshows "are not that deep" is driven by those that don't wish to acknowledge how much effective customer service and a consideration of psychology impacts users' future interactions.
18-01-2016 02:15
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
southlondonphil Offline
Master Poster
****

Posts: 989
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 45
Post: #1046
RE: Kerrie Lee - Chat & Discusion
(18-01-2016 01:30 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  Fernanda's producer last night clearly has interpreted the rules differently compared to Kerrie-Lee's producer tonight

Not necessarily. It might be the same guy who just trusts Fernanda more than he trusts Kerrie-Lee.
18-01-2016 02:38
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rammyrascal Offline
Team Thicc
*****

Posts: 100,176
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 249
Post: #1047
RE: Kerrie Lee - Chat & Discusion
Regardless of what producer Kerrie-Lee has last night, it was still a brilliant babe of the night performance from her including nakedness & oil. Also was her usual fun bubbly self

Hope she's back on soon

YOU STUPID BOOT!!!!
18-01-2016 11:49
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ShandyHand Offline
No Paywall Onlys - not babeshows
*****

Posts: 3,973
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 65
Post: #1048
RE: Kerrie Lee - Chat & Discusion
(18-01-2016 02:38 )southlondonphil Wrote:  
(18-01-2016 01:30 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  Fernanda's producer last night clearly has interpreted the rules differently compared to Kerrie-Lee's producer tonight

Not necessarily. It might be the same guy who just trusts Fernanda more than he trusts Kerrie-Lee.

...for one... or:

2. Plain favouritism.
3. He could have been told or realised he was too lenient with Fernanda.
4. He could have been more inclined to leave off the button when he saw how well Fernanda was doing on the phones as opposed to, perhaps, KL's more normal stats.

As I say, all open to debate, and as Rammy says pretty irrelevant really, it just proves what we have known all along: We will never know when that button will be pressed even with the same guy in charge as the rules are so open to interpretation on any given night.

I have just realised (very stupidly Blush ) that it is only 66 of the babe channels that does their censorship in this way. I'm not sure what that says about 66 as opposed to the others. Is it that they are perhaps more cautious (micro-managing) and perhaps, as phil implies, less trusting of the talent's judgement; or is it that, by taking the responsibility on themselves the producers feel they can let their babes potentially fly closer to the mark?

Regardless, it is definitely a different take on the conundrum to the other channels and probably leads to more varied content levels than elsewhere (maybe frustratingly so for the viewer/caller?). I doubt if more consistency could ever be achieved if they stick to this logo method.

For all it's faults, personally, I'd rather have it than not due to the above.

The idea that the babeshows "are not that deep" is driven by those that don't wish to acknowledge how much effective customer service and a consideration of psychology impacts users' future interactions.
18-01-2016 18:14
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SOCATOA Offline
"mini see through thong"
*****

Posts: 8,646
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 133
Post: #1049
RE: Kerrie Lee - Chat & Discusion
Shoot all the fucking producersannoyed Then we would get nudie showsTongue Would love to see Kerrie's oily chuffTongueTongueTongueTongueHeartHeartHeartHeart
(This post was last modified: 18-01-2016 18:31 by SOCATOA.)
18-01-2016 18:31
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
geezerbob Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 170
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation: 2
Post: #1050
RE: Kerrie Lee - Chat & Discusion
I also got the impression that she was being rationed with her use of oil??????
Let the babe do her thing and we'll get a visual treat annoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyed

Like a wise man once said: "PECKINGORDERITUS"
(This post was last modified: 18-01-2016 19:50 by geezerbob.)
18-01-2016 19:49
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply