S66 Chat

By the way?? Speaking of Ruby from a few posts ago! Have you ever seen someone who looks more like Liz Hurley than Liz Hurley herself?? It is uncanny! Ruby should be well proud to look so like the worlds most beautiful woman

(11-05-2021 10:26 )hornball Wrote:  

(11-05-2021 04:49 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote:  

(10-05-2021 22:25 )darren73 Wrote:  Chat show is now on fv full screen with sound

Count yourself lucky, I watched it on Sky, with sound, (not for long) utter drivel, just nauseating. It's beyond me who this is supposed to appeal to, immature teenagers ? people with a very low IQ. It just wants to make you reach....for the mute button. Right up there with the worst TV ever !!

Listen it depends who is on and the questions/requests they get from those that contact the show!! It will never be the main show, but can work. maybe chloe isn't right for it?? Rhiannon and Ruby got what it is all about

Fully agree. S66 chat can work, it just depends on which babes are doing it & what requests, questions & participation they get from people interacting.

S66 chat is painful to watch and listen.Can anyone explain its benefits.Thanks.

I don't like or understand, why we have to listen to the producer, chatting to the on-screen babe. it's just odd. & wrong. I can't think of any other example, on live tv were this happens, & there's good reason for this. let the presenters present & the producers produce.

Stunning observations from the "Producer" tonight...

"So you've got quite a few tattoos"

Well thank you Captain Fucking Obvious.

It’s been ok tonight. Evski has made an effort with her outfits which are definately not suitable for daytime but Evski has been on her own tonight with no one joining her & at times I turned off as it got boring

As I’ve said needs to be 2 babes on presenting at all times, that alone makes things much better than just 1 babe & a producer

(11-05-2021 22:34 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote:  I don't like or understand, why we have to listen to the producer, chatting to the on-screen babe. it's just odd. & wrong. I can't think of any other example, on live tv were this happens, & there's good reason for this. let the presenters present & the producers produce.

100% agree!! They haven't settled on a format yet, and presumably, with a lack of input from messages, I guess they feel they have to fill the silence with something. Didn't think last night was an example of how this can work, and if you saw it for the first time last night, then yes you would come out against it as a viable or preferable option.

Previous nights have been better, and I have faith, will be again! Yes though - producer can it will you

(11-05-2021 10:26 )hornball Wrote:  it depends who is on and the questions/requests they get from those that contact the show!!

Exactly hornball. The content of the S66 Chat largely depends on those who are interacting with it.

(12-05-2021 10:46 )davy crockett Wrote:  

(11-05-2021 10:26 )hornball Wrote:  it depends who is on and the questions/requests they get from those that contact the show!!

Exactly hornball. The content of the S66 Chat largely depends on those who are interacting with it.

So that in turn compels us to as ask another pertinent question. How to persuade callers / texters that it isn't the main output, and therefore not about t&a but something more?? Again Ruby/Rhiannon got it right. Maybe better callers that night as it was new, but still should have paved the way for more of the same!

If people are curious to what the show will deliver, then they're making progress from when people just wouldn't give it a chance.

They then have to deliver something, mind.