12-09-2020, 00:22
(11-09-2020 22:33 )M-L-L Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not convinced they over-think this or expend that much effort in the way you suggest...
I'm suggesting the top babes take occassion to consider which methods of monetisation work best for them and their (often varying) audience at any one time is all. Combos of vibra tipping and perv work; or tip goals and perv (for instance)... how much focus to give to callers (especially if attempting vibra and cam work at the same time); how much time to allow for privates; how much content to take off of main screen and how much bod to leave on... How much mic work is optimal..? All these and other similar issues play their part if a babe is truly looking for a rounded maximised audience including the best hyped payers. All can attract one punter while putting off another. It's a balancing act (especially for day babes, where the guys requirements are more diverse - if the babe is going for that).
Admittedly answering these considerations is likely largely instinctual to the majority of babes but that doesn't mean there's not a skill set to doing so.
And sure a lot of babes deliberately rule out certain options or they have decisions on how they're going to work taken for them (by the prod's) but the trend is for the babe to do more themselves. No doubt too, a lot of babes just take whatever interaction comes to the fore but the decision is still there. So, not brain surgery no, but like most jobs there CAN be more to it than usually acknowledged when broken down to its nuts and bolts.
I agree the TV aspect has become predominantly a publicity orientated sideshow these days. (I've commented on the recent acceleration in that on the forum before.) The erosion of its importance only complicates the picture for the babe attempting to do both tele and web stints. All my main comments here had their web only work in mind for the most part.